02.04.2013 Views

THERE IS DEATH IN THE POT - The University of Texas at Arlington

THERE IS DEATH IN THE POT - The University of Texas at Arlington

THERE IS DEATH IN THE POT - The University of Texas at Arlington

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

elieved in the “unity <strong>of</strong> moral and m<strong>at</strong>erial progress.” 74 Davis emphasizes the conflict<br />

between Cropper’s commercial success and Quaker beliefs, which ultim<strong>at</strong>ely found<br />

resolution in Adam Smith’s <strong>The</strong> Wealth <strong>of</strong> N<strong>at</strong>ions. Thus, for Cropper, Smith resolved<br />

the tension between Christianity and pr<strong>of</strong>it; the “invisible hand” <strong>of</strong> the market was in<br />

reality the hand <strong>of</strong> God aiding the flow <strong>of</strong> goods toward their n<strong>at</strong>ural market in an<br />

“unfettered interplay <strong>of</strong> capital, labor, and resources.” 75<br />

Cropper became involved in the anti-slavery movement in response to a move by<br />

the West Indian interest to increase duties on East Indian sugar. Free labor and free trade<br />

in legitim<strong>at</strong>e commodities were divinely appointed engines <strong>of</strong> moral progress, according<br />

to Cropper. Discrimin<strong>at</strong>ory duties on East Indian sugar manipul<strong>at</strong>ed the market and<br />

supported slave labor. In a letter to William Wilberforce in May 1821, Cropper claimed<br />

West Indian planters asked for increased duties on East Indian sugar because they feared<br />

free competition with East Indian sugar. “Is not this a most decided admission th<strong>at</strong> their<br />

system <strong>of</strong> cultiv<strong>at</strong>ion cannot exist, unless the country is taxed to support?” Cropper<br />

asked. 76 Slavery depended on discrimin<strong>at</strong>ory duties on imports and bounties on exports.<br />

74 Davis, “James Cropper and the British Anti-Slavery Movement, 1823-1833,” 173. See also<br />

David Brion Davis, Slavery and Human Progress (New York: Oxford <strong>University</strong> Press, 1984), 179-191.<br />

75 Davis, Slavery and Human Progress, 180. According to Davis, <strong>The</strong> Wealth <strong>of</strong> N<strong>at</strong>ions became<br />

for Cropper “a second bible, whose laws were to be no more questioned than the Ten Commandments.<br />

Though still acutely aware <strong>of</strong> the corrupting power <strong>of</strong> wealth, Cropper now saw the hand <strong>of</strong> God in the<br />

flow <strong>of</strong> goods toward their n<strong>at</strong>ural markets, in the unfettered interplay <strong>of</strong> capital, labor, and resources, and<br />

in the contribution <strong>of</strong> individual self-interest to the irresistible march <strong>of</strong> human progress.” See also, David<br />

Brion Davis, “James Cropper and the British Anti-Slavery Movement, 1821-1823,” <strong>The</strong> Journal <strong>of</strong> Negro<br />

History 45 (1960), 244.<br />

76 James Cropper, Letters Addressed to William Wilberforce, M.P.: Recommending the<br />

Encouragement <strong>of</strong> the Cultiv<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> Sugar in Our Dominions in the East Indies as the N<strong>at</strong>ural and Certain<br />

Measures <strong>of</strong> Effecting the Total and General Abolition <strong>of</strong> the Slave-Trade (London: Longman, Hurst, and<br />

Co., 1822).<br />

78

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!