02.04.2013 Views

THERE IS DEATH IN THE POT - The University of Texas at Arlington

THERE IS DEATH IN THE POT - The University of Texas at Arlington

THERE IS DEATH IN THE POT - The University of Texas at Arlington

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

than pr<strong>of</strong>it and loss. In 1792, as the violence <strong>of</strong> the French Revolution escal<strong>at</strong>ed,<br />

abstention rhetoric evolved in response to the bloodshed and the British critique <strong>of</strong> events<br />

in France.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Spectacle <strong>of</strong> De<strong>at</strong>h: Gender, Violence, and Abstention<br />

<strong>The</strong> ultim<strong>at</strong>e failure <strong>of</strong> female sensibility was perhaps most graphically depicted<br />

in descriptions <strong>of</strong> blood-sweetened sugar. Historian Ian Haywood argues th<strong>at</strong> eighteenth-<br />

century abolitionists developed a repertoire <strong>of</strong> “bloody vignettes,” which traced the<br />

slave’s passage from freedom to enslavement, from Africa to the West Indies. 78 “Bloody<br />

vignettes” also described the slave’s transform<strong>at</strong>ion from producer <strong>of</strong> consumer goods to<br />

th<strong>at</strong> which is consumed, thus completing a triangle <strong>of</strong> trade from the West Indies to<br />

Britain. Richard Hillier described a slave, forced to e<strong>at</strong> so th<strong>at</strong> he might live to produce:<br />

“<strong>The</strong> speculum oris is resorted to; a broken tooth gives an opportunity for its<br />

introduction, his mouth is forced open, rice is crammed down his thro<strong>at</strong> and he is forced<br />

to live.” 79 Forced to e<strong>at</strong> and to live, the slave produced goods for domestic consumption.<br />

78 Ian Haywood, Bloody Romanticism: Spectacular Violence and the Politics <strong>of</strong> Represent<strong>at</strong>ion,<br />

1776-1832 (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006), 11.<br />

79 Hillier, A Vindic<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> an Address to the People <strong>of</strong> Gre<strong>at</strong> Britain, 13. Originally designed to<br />

open the mouth in cases <strong>of</strong> lock jaw, the speculum oris was adopted by slaveholders to force open the<br />

mouths <strong>of</strong> slaves who refused to e<strong>at</strong>. See Clarkson, History, I:375-377. In his history <strong>of</strong> the abolition<br />

movement, Clarkson included an illustr<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> this scissor-like device, which he had purchased while in<br />

Liverpool. <strong>The</strong> speculum oris was one <strong>of</strong> several tools used in slave restraint and torture included in<br />

Clarkson’s chest. In addition to these horrific artifacts, Clarkson also collected objects th<strong>at</strong> symbolized the<br />

potential for more civilized trade with Africa. For more on Clarkson’s chest, see Marcus Wood,<br />

“Packaging Liberty and Marketing the Gift <strong>of</strong> Freedom: 1807 and the Legacy <strong>of</strong> Clarkson’s Chest,” in <strong>The</strong><br />

British Slave Trade: Abolition, Parliament, and People, ed. Stephanie Farrell, Melanie Unwin, and James<br />

Walvin (Edinburgh: Edinburgh <strong>University</strong> Press for Parliamentary History Yearbook Trust, 2007), 203-<br />

223; D.C. Devenish, “<strong>The</strong> Slave Trade and Thomas Clarkson’s Chest,” Journal <strong>of</strong> Museum Ethnography 6<br />

(1994), 84-89. Parliament has an online exhibit <strong>of</strong> Clarkson’s chest. See “Parliament and the British Slave<br />

Trade, 1500-1807,” under “Explore/Objects,”<br />

36

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!