02.04.2013 Views

THERE IS DEATH IN THE POT - The University of Texas at Arlington

THERE IS DEATH IN THE POT - The University of Texas at Arlington

THERE IS DEATH IN THE POT - The University of Texas at Arlington

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

to their constitution recommending th<strong>at</strong> “the Members <strong>of</strong> this society should, <strong>at</strong> all times<br />

and on all occasions, give the preference to free produce over th<strong>at</strong> <strong>of</strong> slaves believing th<strong>at</strong><br />

the refusal to purchase and use the products <strong>of</strong> slave labour is one <strong>of</strong> the most efficient<br />

means <strong>of</strong> abolishing slavery.” 35 <strong>The</strong> women <strong>of</strong> the PFASS deliber<strong>at</strong>ely echoed the title <strong>of</strong><br />

Heyrick’s work in their resolution, which was much stronger than the AASS resolution.<br />

Likewise, the black abolitionist founders <strong>of</strong> the American Moral Reform Society,<br />

established in 1836, included free produce in their broad reform agenda. 36<br />

While free produce <strong>at</strong>tempted to build a broad base <strong>of</strong> support, the American<br />

movement relied primarily on the support <strong>of</strong> the Society <strong>of</strong> Friends. <strong>The</strong> organized<br />

American free-produce movement developed in the midst <strong>of</strong> the Hicksite schism <strong>of</strong> the<br />

l<strong>at</strong>e 1820s. Quaker reformer Elias Hicks had advoc<strong>at</strong>ed abstention from slave-labor<br />

products since the 1790s. Hicks’s free-produce activism as well as his broader campaign<br />

against the increasing worldliness <strong>of</strong> American Quakers led to schism in 1827-1828.<br />

Followers <strong>of</strong> Hicks sought a return to traditional Quakerism, emphasizing individual<br />

conscience and purity. In contrast, Orthodox Quakers, influenced by evangelical<br />

Christianity, stressed the importance <strong>of</strong> scriptural authority and doctrinal conformity.<br />

Both Hicksite and Orthodox Quakers supported anti-slavery. In the 1830s, however,<br />

Quaker deb<strong>at</strong>es about abolitionism increasingly focused on defining the appropri<strong>at</strong>e<br />

35 Liber<strong>at</strong>or, December 25, 1863; December 14, 1833 and January 15, 1834, Minutes <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Philadelphia Female Anti-Slavery Society, Reel 30, Pennsylvania Abolition Society, Historical Society <strong>of</strong><br />

Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (hereafter PFASS, HSP).<br />

36 Faulkner, “<strong>The</strong> Root <strong>of</strong> the Evil,” 391. See also Jean R. Soderlund, “Priorities and Power: <strong>The</strong><br />

Philadelphia Female Anti-Slavery Society,” in <strong>The</strong> Abolitionist Sisterhood: Women’s Political Culture in<br />

Antebellum America, ed. Jean Fagan Yellin and John C. Van Horne (Ithaca: Cornell <strong>University</strong> Press,<br />

1994), 67-88; Julie Winch, Philadelphia’s Black Elite: Activism, Accommod<strong>at</strong>ion, and the Struggle for<br />

Autonomy, 1787-1848 (Philadelphia: Temple <strong>University</strong> Press, 1988), 105-106.<br />

xxx

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!