02.04.2013 Views

THERE IS DEATH IN THE POT - The University of Texas at Arlington

THERE IS DEATH IN THE POT - The University of Texas at Arlington

THERE IS DEATH IN THE POT - The University of Texas at Arlington

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

associ<strong>at</strong>ions allowed abstainers and abolitionists to number their friends and find strength<br />

in the abolitionist community. 1<br />

Historians <strong>of</strong> women abolitionists have conclusively demonstr<strong>at</strong>ed the importance<br />

<strong>of</strong> associ<strong>at</strong>ions to women’s activism. Women’s anti-slavery and free-produce societies<br />

provided structure, motiv<strong>at</strong>ion, and resources for reform work. Through these “sister<br />

societies” women developed and maintained local, n<strong>at</strong>ional, and intern<strong>at</strong>ional friendships.<br />

American women established societies and organized n<strong>at</strong>ional anti-slavery conventions<br />

for women, g<strong>at</strong>hered sign<strong>at</strong>ures on petitions, and raised funds. 2 <strong>The</strong>se formal groups<br />

were nurtured by important informal networks, which developed in rel<strong>at</strong>ionship with<br />

these associ<strong>at</strong>ions. <strong>The</strong>se formal and informal networks served as vital communities for<br />

British and American abolitionist women.<br />

John C. Walsh and Steven High identified three fundamental elements for<br />

understanding the historical significance <strong>of</strong> community. First, community is culturally<br />

constructed around “imagined communities” <strong>of</strong> shared values, truths, and symbols and is<br />

not dependent upon a shared physical place such as a town or neighborhood to establish<br />

inclusion or exclusion. Second, community is based on “social interaction” and networks<br />

<strong>of</strong> power, which provide “moral regul<strong>at</strong>ion” among members. Finally, communities are<br />

inherently fluid, changing over time. 3 <strong>The</strong>se three elements help explain the development<br />

1830.<br />

1 [Elizabeth Margaret Chandler], “Associ<strong>at</strong>ions,” Genius <strong>of</strong> Universal Emancip<strong>at</strong>ion, January 22,<br />

2<br />

For example, see Salerno, Sister Societies; Yellin and Van Horne, eds., <strong>The</strong> Abolitionist<br />

Sisterhood.<br />

3<br />

John C. Walsh and Steven High, “Rethinking the Concept <strong>of</strong> Community,” Social History 32<br />

(1999), 255-273.<br />

134

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!