02.04.2013 Views

THERE IS DEATH IN THE POT - The University of Texas at Arlington

THERE IS DEATH IN THE POT - The University of Texas at Arlington

THERE IS DEATH IN THE POT - The University of Texas at Arlington

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

evive the slave trade deb<strong>at</strong>e again in 1793, but the House <strong>of</strong> Commons refused. In June<br />

<strong>of</strong> th<strong>at</strong> year, the Committee set up a group to draft a letter encouraging supporters to<br />

continue the boycott. In July, the Committee decided against sending the letters and by<br />

August suspended all boycott activities. In 1793, the Committee met thirty-three times.<br />

<strong>The</strong> following year th<strong>at</strong> number fell to nine and by 1797 the Committee ceased<br />

oper<strong>at</strong>ions. 90<br />

Historians argue th<strong>at</strong> events in Haiti and France had a stagn<strong>at</strong>ing effect on the<br />

trans<strong>at</strong>lantic abolitionist movement. 91 Writing in 1793, the Reverend Samuel Hopkins<br />

worried th<strong>at</strong> nothing more could be said about slavery. <strong>The</strong> Gentleman’s Magazine made<br />

a similar observ<strong>at</strong>ion describing the slave trade as “this most exhausted topic.” 92 R<strong>at</strong>her<br />

than languishing, however, abolitionist and abstention rhetoric appropri<strong>at</strong>ed the language<br />

<strong>of</strong> revolution. Until early 1792, violent imagery was primarily associ<strong>at</strong>ed with<br />

abolitionism; however, as reports <strong>of</strong> events in France and Haiti started appearing in<br />

British and American public<strong>at</strong>ions, abolitionists lost their monopoly on violence. 93<br />

While the trope <strong>of</strong> blood-stained sugar had been part <strong>of</strong> anti-sugar rhetoric from<br />

the beginning, the public<strong>at</strong>ion in 1792 <strong>of</strong> Andrew Burn’s tract, A Second Address to the<br />

90 Coleman, “Conspicuous Consumption,” 342; Oldfield, Popular Politics, 185-187.<br />

91<br />

Coleman, “Conspicuous Consumption,” 342; Davis, <strong>The</strong> Problem <strong>of</strong> Slavery in the Age <strong>of</strong><br />

Revolution, 329.<br />

92 Samuel Hopkins, A Discourse upon the Slave-Trade, and the Slavery <strong>of</strong> the Africans. Delivered<br />

in the Baptist Meeting-House <strong>at</strong> Providence, before the Providence Society for Abolishing the Slave-Trade,<br />

&c. At their Annual Meeting, on May 17, 1793 (Providence: J. Carter, 1793), 3; Gentleman’s Magazine, as<br />

quoted in Davies, “A Moral Purchase,” 141-142.<br />

93 Carey, British Abolitionists and the Rhetoric <strong>of</strong> Sensibility, 89; Rachel Cleves, <strong>The</strong> Reign <strong>of</strong><br />

Terror in America: Visions <strong>of</strong> Violence from Anti-Jacobinism to Antislavery (New York: Cambridge<br />

<strong>University</strong> Press, 2009), 104-152; Haywood, Bloody Romanticism.<br />

43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!