02.04.2013 Views

THERE IS DEATH IN THE POT - The University of Texas at Arlington

THERE IS DEATH IN THE POT - The University of Texas at Arlington

THERE IS DEATH IN THE POT - The University of Texas at Arlington

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the poem can only make the briefest replies to her child’s disbelief. In the final stanza,<br />

the mother confirms her child’s conclusions and completes the child’s socializ<strong>at</strong>ion into<br />

American political culture. 65<br />

In “Looking <strong>at</strong> the Soldiers,” Chandler cre<strong>at</strong>ed a counter-history <strong>of</strong> the founding<br />

<strong>of</strong> the United St<strong>at</strong>es. In the opening stanzas, the child describes the pageantry <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Fourth <strong>of</strong> July parade. <strong>The</strong> drums, the trumpets, the soldiers, and the horses are, for the<br />

child, a lesson in the history <strong>of</strong> events th<strong>at</strong> “saw our country set free.” But the mother<br />

reminds the child th<strong>at</strong> liberty and revolution were “made in man’s blood.” More than<br />

bloodshed, however, the mother is distressed <strong>at</strong> the hypocrisy <strong>of</strong> the American<br />

Revolution:<br />

Our country, my boy, as you tell me, is free,<br />

But even th<strong>at</strong> thought brings a sadness to me;<br />

For less guilt would be hers, were her own fetter’d hand<br />

Unable to loosen her slaves from their band.<br />

Chandler rejected the mother who uncritically accepted p<strong>at</strong>riotism; instead, she exposed<br />

the contradiction <strong>of</strong> celebr<strong>at</strong>ing American independence while holding millions <strong>of</strong> slaves<br />

in chains. Moreover, the abolitionist mother-historian in “Looking <strong>at</strong> the Soldiers” urged<br />

her child to consider the different interpret<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>of</strong> revolution. <strong>The</strong> American colonists<br />

revolted against Gre<strong>at</strong> Britain and their success was celebr<strong>at</strong>ed by subsequent<br />

gener<strong>at</strong>ions. If American slaves revolted, however, it would be considered rebellion and<br />

lead to a much bloodier conclusion:<br />

65 [Elizabeth Margaret Chandler], “Wh<strong>at</strong> is a Slave, Mother?” in Juvenile Poems for the Use <strong>of</strong><br />

Free American Children <strong>of</strong> Every Complexion, ed. William Lloyd Garrison (Boston: Garrison and Knapp,<br />

1835), 13-14. “Wh<strong>at</strong> is a Slave, Mother?” was also printed in Lundy, Poetical Works, 70-71. See also De<br />

Rosa, Domestic Abolitionism and Juvenile Liter<strong>at</strong>ure, 96.<br />

119

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!