02.04.2013 Views

THERE IS DEATH IN THE POT - The University of Texas at Arlington

THERE IS DEATH IN THE POT - The University of Texas at Arlington

THERE IS DEATH IN THE POT - The University of Texas at Arlington

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

League <strong>of</strong> Universal Brotherhood. In the mid-1850s, when Anna Richardson withdrew<br />

from active particip<strong>at</strong>ion in the organized free-produce movement because <strong>of</strong> her<br />

husband’s illness, Burritt assumed editorial responsibilities for the Richardsons’<br />

public<strong>at</strong>ion, <strong>The</strong> Slave. In the l<strong>at</strong>e 1850s, Garnet, inspired by Orthodox Quaker Benjamin<br />

Co<strong>at</strong>es’s Cotton Cultiv<strong>at</strong>ion in Africa, re-organized the African Civiliz<strong>at</strong>ion Society as<br />

part <strong>of</strong> an effort to increase the cultiv<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> free-labor cotton in Africa and displace<br />

from the British market slave-grown cotton from the American South. Despite the<br />

efforts <strong>of</strong> Garnet, Co<strong>at</strong>es, the Richardsons, and Burritt, support for the free-produce<br />

movement continued to decline in the l<strong>at</strong>e 1850s. <strong>The</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> coloniz<strong>at</strong>ionists like<br />

Co<strong>at</strong>es left many radical free-produce supporters wary <strong>of</strong> the organiz<strong>at</strong>ion. 5<br />

Despite its lengthy history, the free-produce movement failed to maintain a broad<br />

following. At its most popular, in the l<strong>at</strong>e eighteenth-century, abstention from slave-<br />

labor products drew nearly a half million supporters in England. In the nineteenth-<br />

century, however, British and American abstainers failed to replic<strong>at</strong>e the heady days <strong>of</strong><br />

the 1791-1792 boycott. <strong>The</strong> failure <strong>of</strong> the free-produce movement to develop a<br />

sustainable following or to end slavery has led historians to dismiss abstention as a<br />

footnote in the history <strong>of</strong> abolitionism. <strong>The</strong> problem with earlier historical assessments<br />

5 Ibid., 119-124, 143-144, 162-194; Lapsansky-Warner, Back to Africa, 33-34; Faulkner, “<strong>The</strong><br />

Root <strong>of</strong> the Evil,” 400-403. See also Henry Highland Garnet to Samuel Rhodes, December 5, 1850, in <strong>The</strong><br />

Black Abolitionist Papers: <strong>The</strong> British Isles, 1830-1865, C. Peter Ripley, ed. (Chapel Hill: <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

North Carolina Press, 1983), I: 232. Celebr<strong>at</strong>ing the increasing interest <strong>of</strong> British capitalists, Garnet told<br />

Rhodes, “Allowing their motives to be purely commercial, yet the effect <strong>of</strong> their movement will be the<br />

same upon slavery, and will do the same thing th<strong>at</strong> those benevolent people desire who base their efforts<br />

upon humane and moral principles.” See also Benjamin Co<strong>at</strong>es, Cotton Cultiv<strong>at</strong>ion in Africa. Suggestions<br />

on the Importance <strong>of</strong> the Cultiv<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> Cotton in Africa, in Reference to the Abolition <strong>of</strong> Slavery in the<br />

United St<strong>at</strong>es, Through the Organiz<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> an African Civiliz<strong>at</strong>ion Society (Philadelphia: C. Sherman and<br />

Son, 1858). Co<strong>at</strong>es hoped the organiz<strong>at</strong>ion would appeal to Friends who were reluctant to join the more<br />

political anti-slavery or coloniz<strong>at</strong>ion movements.<br />

217

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!