THERE IS DEATH IN THE POT - The University of Texas at Arlington
THERE IS DEATH IN THE POT - The University of Texas at Arlington
THERE IS DEATH IN THE POT - The University of Texas at Arlington
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
League <strong>of</strong> Universal Brotherhood. In the mid-1850s, when Anna Richardson withdrew<br />
from active particip<strong>at</strong>ion in the organized free-produce movement because <strong>of</strong> her<br />
husband’s illness, Burritt assumed editorial responsibilities for the Richardsons’<br />
public<strong>at</strong>ion, <strong>The</strong> Slave. In the l<strong>at</strong>e 1850s, Garnet, inspired by Orthodox Quaker Benjamin<br />
Co<strong>at</strong>es’s Cotton Cultiv<strong>at</strong>ion in Africa, re-organized the African Civiliz<strong>at</strong>ion Society as<br />
part <strong>of</strong> an effort to increase the cultiv<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> free-labor cotton in Africa and displace<br />
from the British market slave-grown cotton from the American South. Despite the<br />
efforts <strong>of</strong> Garnet, Co<strong>at</strong>es, the Richardsons, and Burritt, support for the free-produce<br />
movement continued to decline in the l<strong>at</strong>e 1850s. <strong>The</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> coloniz<strong>at</strong>ionists like<br />
Co<strong>at</strong>es left many radical free-produce supporters wary <strong>of</strong> the organiz<strong>at</strong>ion. 5<br />
Despite its lengthy history, the free-produce movement failed to maintain a broad<br />
following. At its most popular, in the l<strong>at</strong>e eighteenth-century, abstention from slave-<br />
labor products drew nearly a half million supporters in England. In the nineteenth-<br />
century, however, British and American abstainers failed to replic<strong>at</strong>e the heady days <strong>of</strong><br />
the 1791-1792 boycott. <strong>The</strong> failure <strong>of</strong> the free-produce movement to develop a<br />
sustainable following or to end slavery has led historians to dismiss abstention as a<br />
footnote in the history <strong>of</strong> abolitionism. <strong>The</strong> problem with earlier historical assessments<br />
5 Ibid., 119-124, 143-144, 162-194; Lapsansky-Warner, Back to Africa, 33-34; Faulkner, “<strong>The</strong><br />
Root <strong>of</strong> the Evil,” 400-403. See also Henry Highland Garnet to Samuel Rhodes, December 5, 1850, in <strong>The</strong><br />
Black Abolitionist Papers: <strong>The</strong> British Isles, 1830-1865, C. Peter Ripley, ed. (Chapel Hill: <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
North Carolina Press, 1983), I: 232. Celebr<strong>at</strong>ing the increasing interest <strong>of</strong> British capitalists, Garnet told<br />
Rhodes, “Allowing their motives to be purely commercial, yet the effect <strong>of</strong> their movement will be the<br />
same upon slavery, and will do the same thing th<strong>at</strong> those benevolent people desire who base their efforts<br />
upon humane and moral principles.” See also Benjamin Co<strong>at</strong>es, Cotton Cultiv<strong>at</strong>ion in Africa. Suggestions<br />
on the Importance <strong>of</strong> the Cultiv<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> Cotton in Africa, in Reference to the Abolition <strong>of</strong> Slavery in the<br />
United St<strong>at</strong>es, Through the Organiz<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> an African Civiliz<strong>at</strong>ion Society (Philadelphia: C. Sherman and<br />
Son, 1858). Co<strong>at</strong>es hoped the organiz<strong>at</strong>ion would appeal to Friends who were reluctant to join the more<br />
political anti-slavery or coloniz<strong>at</strong>ion movements.<br />
217