02.04.2013 Views

THERE IS DEATH IN THE POT - The University of Texas at Arlington

THERE IS DEATH IN THE POT - The University of Texas at Arlington

THERE IS DEATH IN THE POT - The University of Texas at Arlington

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ace in many <strong>of</strong> its associ<strong>at</strong>ions and because the movement stressed the importance <strong>of</strong><br />

individual purity, free produce challenges an abolitionist historiography th<strong>at</strong> remains<br />

deeply influenced by the idea <strong>of</strong> “separ<strong>at</strong>e spheres.” 57 Indeed, there are a lot <strong>of</strong> binaries<br />

in abolitionist historiography: male or female activism, politics or moral suasion, violent<br />

or peaceful measures. Women’s activism remains defined by peaceful means such as<br />

petitions to Congress, anti-slavery fairs, and moral suasion. Such a definition, however,<br />

precludes any hint <strong>of</strong> radicalism except as those activities led to the call for women’s<br />

rights. Much <strong>of</strong> the scholarship on abolitionist women in general remains segreg<strong>at</strong>ed and<br />

marginalized in a history <strong>of</strong> anti-slavery th<strong>at</strong> is still interpreted by its male activists. 58<br />

While the field <strong>of</strong> abolitionist studies is, as Manisha Sinha argues, “much richer” as the<br />

result <strong>of</strong> new research focusing on women and African Americans, it is <strong>at</strong> the same time<br />

“considerably more fragmented.” 59 <strong>The</strong> free-produce movement <strong>of</strong>fers an opportunity to<br />

synthesize the various divisions within the historiography <strong>of</strong> abolitionism and highlight<br />

the radicalism <strong>of</strong> women activists.<br />

57 See Jean Fagan Yellin and John C. Van Horne, eds. <strong>The</strong> Abolitionist Sisterhood: Women’s<br />

Political Culture in Antebellum America (Ithaca: Cornell <strong>University</strong> Press, 1994) and Julie Roy Jeffrey,<br />

“Permeable Boundaries: Abolitionist Women and Separ<strong>at</strong>e Spheres,” Journal <strong>of</strong> the Early Republic 21<br />

(2001), 79-93.<br />

58 For example, see the recent body <strong>of</strong> John Brown scholarship: John Stauffer, <strong>The</strong> Black Hearts <strong>of</strong><br />

Men: Radical Abolitionists and the Transform<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> Race (Cambridge, MA: Harvard <strong>University</strong> Press,<br />

2001); David Reynolds, John Brown, Abolitionist: <strong>The</strong> Man who Killed Slavery, Sparked the Civil War,<br />

and Seeded Civil Rights (New York: Vintage, 2006). For a notable exception in Brown scholarship, see<br />

Bonnie Laughlin-Schultz, “‘Could I not do something for the cause?’: <strong>The</strong> Brown Women, Antislavery<br />

Reform, and Memory <strong>of</strong> Militant Abolitionism,” PhD diss., Indiana <strong>University</strong>, 2009. For another<br />

perspective on gender and violent abolitionism, see Kristen Tegtmeier Oertel, Bleeding Borders: Race,<br />

Gender, and Violence in Pre-Civil War Kansas (B<strong>at</strong>on Rouge: Louisiana St<strong>at</strong>e <strong>University</strong> Press, 2009).<br />

59 Manisha Sinha, “Coming <strong>of</strong> Age: <strong>The</strong> Historiography <strong>of</strong> Black Abolitionism,” in Prophets <strong>of</strong><br />

Protest: Reconsidering the History <strong>of</strong> American Abolitionism, ed. Timothy P<strong>at</strong>rick McCarthy and John<br />

Stauffer (New York: <strong>The</strong> New Press, 2006), 37.<br />

xxxvii

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!