02.04.2013 Views

THERE IS DEATH IN THE POT - The University of Texas at Arlington

THERE IS DEATH IN THE POT - The University of Texas at Arlington

THERE IS DEATH IN THE POT - The University of Texas at Arlington

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>of</strong> the trans<strong>at</strong>lantic abolitionist and free-produce communities, particularly in the 1830s<br />

and 1840s. Community was important for abstainers. Free-produce and abolitionist<br />

associ<strong>at</strong>ions sustained women in their individual efforts to forgo slave-labor products.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se associ<strong>at</strong>ions and the informal communities they gener<strong>at</strong>ed also sustained radical<br />

women as they faced criticism for their increasingly public activism. Abstainers<br />

<strong>at</strong>tempted to project their moral stance against slave-labor products into the larger<br />

abolitionist community. Initially, those efforts were generally welcomed by individuals<br />

and associ<strong>at</strong>ions such as William Lloyd Garrison and the American Anti-Slavery Society.<br />

However, as the American and British abolitionist movements shifted in response to<br />

internal and external challenges, the abstention movement was transformed.<br />

In the 1830s, as abolitionists formed associ<strong>at</strong>ions such as the American Anti-<br />

Slavery Society (AASS) and the Philadelphia Female Anti-Slavery Society (PFASS),<br />

their constitutions and their published st<strong>at</strong>ements reflected their free-produce origins and<br />

their Quaker membership. Free-produce rhetoric also figured prominently in Quaker<br />

deb<strong>at</strong>es about the proper rel<strong>at</strong>ionship between Friends and the radical abolitionist<br />

movement. Friends’ responses to radical abolitionism were deeply influenced by the<br />

1827-1828 schism between Orthodox and Hicksite Quakers. Abstinence from slave-<br />

labor products affirmed traditional Quaker tenets. Yet, Quakers were mindful th<strong>at</strong> Elias<br />

Hicks had been an ardent proponent <strong>of</strong> abstinence and th<strong>at</strong> his free-produce testimony<br />

had contributed to the divisions among American Quakers. 4 Many Friends worried th<strong>at</strong><br />

4 Lydia Maria Child, Isaac T. Hopper: A True Life (Boston: John P. Jewett, 1854), 276-282. Child<br />

claimed the Hicksite schism resulted from Quaker differences over the use <strong>of</strong> slave-labor products. Child<br />

was not alone among her contemporaries in pointing to free produce as the cause <strong>of</strong> division among<br />

Quakers. Twentieth-century histories <strong>of</strong> the Quaker schism, however, illumin<strong>at</strong>e the complex origins <strong>of</strong> the<br />

135

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!