02.04.2013 Views

THERE IS DEATH IN THE POT - The University of Texas at Arlington

THERE IS DEATH IN THE POT - The University of Texas at Arlington

THERE IS DEATH IN THE POT - The University of Texas at Arlington

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Supervising Pr<strong>of</strong>essor: Sam W. Haynes<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

“<strong><strong>THE</strong>RE</strong> <strong>IS</strong> <strong>DEATH</strong> <strong>IN</strong> <strong>THE</strong> <strong>POT</strong>”: WOMEN,<br />

CONSUMPTION, AND FREE PRODUCE<br />

<strong>IN</strong> <strong>THE</strong> TRANSATLANTIC<br />

WORLD, 1791-1848<br />

Julie Holcomb, PhD<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Texas</strong> <strong>at</strong> <strong>Arlington</strong>, 2010<br />

Abstention from slave-labor products, along with petitioning, was a popular and<br />

consistent form <strong>of</strong> anti-slavery activism for British and American abolitionists, especially<br />

women. Despite renewed interest in the British and American free-produce movements,<br />

historians continue to focus on either eighteenth- or nineteenth-century British or<br />

American abstention, only briefly referring to the trans<strong>at</strong>lantic and gener<strong>at</strong>ional<br />

connections between the movements. Limiting questions about free-produce in this way<br />

overemphasizes the connection between abstention and the Society <strong>of</strong> Friends and<br />

privileges the nineteenth-century period <strong>of</strong> the movement. While Quakers were the<br />

primary proponents <strong>of</strong> abstention from slave-labor products, <strong>at</strong>tempts by both Quakers<br />

x

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!