02.04.2013 Views

THERE IS DEATH IN THE POT - The University of Texas at Arlington

THERE IS DEATH IN THE POT - The University of Texas at Arlington

THERE IS DEATH IN THE POT - The University of Texas at Arlington

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chandler’s work serves as an important bridge between the British free-produce<br />

movement and its early American counterpart. When Chandler reprinted and commented<br />

on Elizabeth Heyrick’s work in the “Ladies’ Repository,” she consciously placed herself<br />

within an Anglo-American tradition <strong>of</strong> female free-produce activism. Her work on the<br />

“Ladies’ Repository” provided an opportunity to work with the two leading abolitionist<br />

editors <strong>of</strong> the period: Benjamin Lundy and William Lloyd Garrison. As a Hicksite<br />

Quaker, Chandler was influenced by the free-produce testimony <strong>of</strong> Elias Hicks as well as<br />

the seemingly more mainstream ministry <strong>of</strong> eighteenth-century Quakers John Woolman<br />

and Anthony Benezet. Chandler’s literary work was further shaped by the free-produce<br />

activism <strong>of</strong> fellow Hicksite Quakers Lucretia Mott, Lydia White, and Hannah<br />

Townsend. 10 In Chandler’s literary work, these American influences — Quaker and non-<br />

Quaker alike — merged with British free-produce rhetoric. R<strong>at</strong>her than the quiet, Quaker<br />

activist described by many historians, Chandler played a prominent role in reinterpreting<br />

British free-produce rhetoric for an American movement, urging women to ever higher<br />

levels <strong>of</strong> activism. 11<br />

with Portraits, Biographical Notices, and Specimens <strong>of</strong> <strong>The</strong>ir Writings, 7 th ed. rev. (Philadelphia: E.H.<br />

Butler and Co., 1857).<br />

10 While preparing his memoir <strong>of</strong> Chandler, Lundy consulted Mott and Hannah Townsend<br />

Longstreth. <strong>The</strong> two women were the only individuals Lundy consulted other than Elizabeth’s brother,<br />

Thomas, and her uncle, Lemuel Howell. In a letter to Thomas, Lundy noted th<strong>at</strong> Mott had seen the work in<br />

progress “and expressed . . . s<strong>at</strong>isfaction with it.” <strong>The</strong> Chandlers’ uncle Lemuel Howell ultim<strong>at</strong>ely<br />

published the completed volume. See Benjamin Lundy to Thomas Chandler, February 16, 1836, RTD,<br />

304-305.<br />

11 See Jeffrey, <strong>The</strong> Gre<strong>at</strong> Silent Army <strong>of</strong> Abolitionism, 21. Chandler did produce much <strong>of</strong> her work<br />

anonymously, which along with her occasional self-effacing comments has led historians to describe her<br />

(like Lucretia Mott) as a quiet Quaker. Chandler is generally accorded an early and minor role in American<br />

abolitionism. For example, in addition to Jeffrey’s work see Hersh, <strong>The</strong> Slavery <strong>of</strong> Sex, 7-10; Salerno,<br />

Sister Societies, 21-23. For a more extensive discussion <strong>of</strong> Chandler within the context <strong>of</strong> women’s antislavery<br />

activism, see Alma Lutz, Crusade for Freedom: Women <strong>of</strong> the Anti-slavery Movement (Boston:<br />

96

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!