02.04.2013 Views

THERE IS DEATH IN THE POT - The University of Texas at Arlington

THERE IS DEATH IN THE POT - The University of Texas at Arlington

THERE IS DEATH IN THE POT - The University of Texas at Arlington

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

denied Fox’s claim for a high r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> de<strong>at</strong>h among African slaves in the Caribbean and<br />

instead argued th<strong>at</strong> more working class men in Britain died young “either by hazardous<br />

employments, by working in infectious trades, or by extreme labour.” Calling English<br />

miners “underground slaves,” she argued th<strong>at</strong> if the labor conditions <strong>of</strong> these working<br />

men were examined, their situ<strong>at</strong>ion would be found “unenviable, even by the West Indian<br />

slave.” By privileging white laborers and emphasizing the impact abolition would have<br />

on white Britons, the female apologist placed her tract within an established rhetorical<br />

tradition. 69<br />

Emphasizing the importance <strong>of</strong> slave-goods, pro-slave trade writers cre<strong>at</strong>ed wh<strong>at</strong><br />

historian Brycchan Carey has described as a “hierarchy <strong>of</strong> suffering.” By diverting<br />

<strong>at</strong>tention to miners, for example, the anonymous author used a common rhetorical device<br />

in pro-slave trade writing. Carey argues th<strong>at</strong> child chimney sweeps and miners were<br />

most <strong>of</strong>ten singled out for comparison with slaves because all three groups shared harsh<br />

labor conditions, child labor, high mortality r<strong>at</strong>es as well as having “black faces in<br />

common.” Relief for child chimney sweeps was supported by abolitionists and pro-<br />

slavery supporters alike; however, pro-slavery supporters used their concern for child<br />

chimney sweeps to argue, like the female apologist, th<strong>at</strong> “charity” should begin <strong>at</strong><br />

home. 70<br />

In his Vindic<strong>at</strong>ion, Hillier did not challenge the female author’s right to speak out<br />

publicly against abstention from sugar; however, he did challenge her femininity and<br />

69 An Answer to a Pamphlet Intituled [sic] An Address to the People <strong>of</strong> England against the Use <strong>of</strong><br />

West Indian Produce (Whitechapel: W. Moon, 1791), 4-7.<br />

70 Carey, British Abolitionism and the Rhetoric <strong>of</strong> Sensibility, 130, 124, 127.<br />

32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!