02.04.2013 Views

THERE IS DEATH IN THE POT - The University of Texas at Arlington

THERE IS DEATH IN THE POT - The University of Texas at Arlington

THERE IS DEATH IN THE POT - The University of Texas at Arlington

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

conditions <strong>of</strong> Leicester’s framework knitters had been presented to the Select Committee<br />

<strong>of</strong> the House <strong>of</strong> Commons, according to Heyrick, yet the evidence had failed to address<br />

the “root <strong>of</strong> the mischief.” Instead, Parliament preferred to silence r<strong>at</strong>her than remove the<br />

cause <strong>of</strong> dissent. According to Heyrick, the depreci<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> the value <strong>of</strong> human labor was<br />

systemic and endangered n<strong>at</strong>ional health. Providing laborers with an immedi<strong>at</strong>e increase<br />

to a living wage would elimin<strong>at</strong>e their need for parish support turning laborers into<br />

supporters <strong>of</strong> trade. Heyrick called on Parliament to take up the cause <strong>of</strong> the poor and<br />

enslaved laborer alike, breaking the bonds <strong>of</strong> all oppressed laborers. Writing within the<br />

context <strong>of</strong> the Peterloo Massacre <strong>of</strong> 1819, a defining moment in government suppression<br />

<strong>of</strong> the working class, Heyrick adopted a radical position. 91 In 1825, Heyrick wrote<br />

another tract in support <strong>of</strong> the framework knitters who were striking after manufacturers<br />

lowered wages yet again. 92<br />

In comparing slaves and the working class, Heyrick engaged an established<br />

rhetorical argument. In the eighteenth century, supporters <strong>of</strong> the slave trade invoked the<br />

working conditions <strong>of</strong> British miners and child chimney sweeps to argue th<strong>at</strong> charity<br />

91 Elizabeth Heyrick, Enquiry into the Consequences <strong>of</strong> the Present Depreci<strong>at</strong>ed Value <strong>of</strong> Human<br />

Labour (London: Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme and Brown, 1819). For more on the Peterloo Massacre, see<br />

Donald Read, Peterloo: <strong>The</strong> “Massacre” and its Background (Manchester: Manchester <strong>University</strong> Press,<br />

1958). <strong>The</strong> Peterloo Massacre occurred on August 16, 1819 when cavalry charged into a crowd <strong>of</strong> more<br />

than sixty thousand men, women, and children who had g<strong>at</strong>hered to demand reform <strong>of</strong> parliamentary<br />

represent<strong>at</strong>ion. Poor economic conditions after the Napoleonic wars as well as a lack <strong>of</strong> suffrage in<br />

northern England contributed to the development <strong>of</strong> working-class radicalism in this period. Robert Poole<br />

calls the Peterloo Massacre “one <strong>of</strong> the defining events <strong>of</strong> its age.” Robert Poole, “‘By Law or By Sword’:<br />

Peterloo Revisited,” History 91 (2006), 254-276.<br />

92 Elizabeth Heyrick, A Letter <strong>of</strong> Remonstrance from an Impartial Public, to the Hosiers <strong>of</strong><br />

Leicester (Leicester: A. Cockshaw, 1825); Midgley, Feminism and Empire, 60; Corfield, “Elizabeth<br />

Heyrick,” 58.<br />

84

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!