Soil Survey of Lincoln County, West Virginia - Soil Data Mart - US ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Soil Survey of Lincoln County, West Virginia Table 8a.--Agricultural Waste Management (The information in this table indicates the dominant soil condition but does not eliminate the need for onsite investigation. The numbers in the value columns range from 0.01 to 1.00. The larger the value, the greater the limitation. See text for further explanation of ratings in this table.) ______________________________________________________________________________ | | | |Pct.| Application of manure | Application Map symbol | of |and food-processing waste| of sewage sludge and soil name |map |_________________________|_________________________ |unit| Rating class and |Value| Rating class and |Value | | limiting features | | limiting features | _____________________|____|___________________|_____|___________________|_____ | | | | | AgB: | | | | | Allegheny-----------| 90 |Somewhat limited | |Very limited | | | Too acid |0.73 | Low adsorption |1.00 | | | | Too acid |1.00 | | | | | AgC: | | | | | Allegheny-----------| 90 |Somewhat limited | |Very limited | | | Too acid |0.73 | Low adsorption |1.00 | | Slope |0.63 | Too acid |1.00 | | | | Slope |0.63 | | | | | BeD: | | | | | Beech---------------| 80 |Not rated | |Not rated | | | | | | BeE: | | | | | Beech---------------| 70 |Not rated | |Not rated | | | | | | BSF: | | | | | Berks---------------| 40 |Not rated | |Not rated | | | | | | Shelocta------------| 35 |Not rated | |Not rated | | | | | | CeF: | | | | | Cedarcreek----------| 70 |Very limited | |Very limited | | | Slope |1.00 | Slope |1.00 | | Large stones |1.00 | Too acid |0.96 | | content | | Cobble content |0.87 | | Cobble content |0.87 | | | | | | | Rock outcrop--------| 15 |Not rated | |Not rated | | | | | | Ch: | | | | | Chagrin-------------| 75 |Very limited | |Very limited | | | Flooding |1.00 | Flooding |1.00 | | Too acid |0.11 | Too acid |0.42 | | | | | CoA: | | | | | Cotaco--------------| 80 |Very limited | |Very limited | | | Depth to |0.99 | Depth to |0.99 | | saturated zone | | saturated zone | | | Too acid |0.50 | Too acid |0.99 | | | | | CoB: | | | | | Cotaco--------------| 80 |Very limited | |Very limited | | | Depth to |0.99 | Depth to |0.99 | | saturated zone | | saturated zone | | | Too acid |0.50 | Too acid |0.99 | | | | | CuB: | | | | | Cotaco--------------| 40 |Very limited | |Very limited | | | Depth to |0.99 | Depth to |0.99 | | saturated zone | | saturated zone | | | Too acid |0.50 | Too acid |0.99 | | | | | Urban land----------| 25 |Not rated | |Not rated | | | | | | 264
Soil Survey of Lincoln County, West Virginia Table 8a.--Agricultural Waste Management--Continued ______________________________________________________________________________ | | | |Pct.| Application of manure | Application Map symbol | of |and food-processing waste| of sewage sludge and soil name |map |_________________________|_________________________ |unit| Rating class and |Value| Rating class and |Value | | limiting features | | limiting features | _____________________|____|___________________|_____|___________________|_____ | | | | | CuC: | | | | | Cotaco--------------| 40 |Very limited | |Very limited | | | Depth to |0.99 | Depth to |0.99 | | saturated zone | | saturated zone | | | Slope |0.63 | Too acid |0.99 | | Too acid |0.50 | Slope |0.63 | | | | | Urban land----------| 25 |Not rated | |Not rated | | | | | | DlD: | | | | | Dormont-------------| 45 |Very limited | |Very limited | | | Slope |1.00 | Low adsorption |1.00 | | Depth to |0.96 | Slope |1.00 | | saturated zone | | Depth to |0.96 | | Too acid |0.32 | saturated zone | | | | | | Latham--------------| 35 |Very limited | |Very limited | | | Slope |1.00 | Slow water |1.00 | | Slow water |1.00 | movement | | | movement | | Low adsorption |1.00 | | Depth to |0.96 | Slope |1.00 | | saturated zone | | | | | | | | DlE: | | | | | Dormont-------------| 50 |Very limited | |Very limited | | | Slope |1.00 | Low adsorption |1.00 | | Depth to |0.96 | Slope |1.00 | | saturated zone | | Depth to |0.96 | | Too acid |0.32 | saturated zone | | | | | | Latham--------------| 25 |Very limited | |Very limited | | | Slope |1.00 | Slow water |1.00 | | Slow water |1.00 | movement | | | movement | | Low adsorption |1.00 | | Depth to |0.96 | Slope |1.00 | | saturated zone | | | | | | | | GiD: | | | | | Gilpin--------------| 70 |Not rated | |Not rated | | | | | | GiE: | | | | | Gilpin--------------| 80 |Not rated | |Not rated | | | | | | GlF: | | | | | Gilpin--------------| 70 |Not rated | |Not rated | | | | | | GmE: | | | | | Gilpin--------------| 40 |Not rated | |Not rated | | | | | | Matewan-------------| 35 |Not rated | |Not rated | | | | | | GpC: | | | | | Gilpin--------------| 55 |Not rated | |Not rated | | | | | | Upshur--------------| 25 |Not rated | |Not rated | | | | | | GpD: | | | | | Gilpin--------------| 55 |Not rated | |Not rated | | | | | | Upshur--------------| 25 |Not rated | |Not rated | | | | | | 265
Page 1:
United States Department of Agricul
Page 4 and 5:
Soil Survey of Lincoln County, West
Page 6 and 7:
Page 8 and 9:
Page 11:
Foreword Soil Survey of Lincoln Cou
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27:
Siltstone Gilpin Gilpin-Upshur Mosh
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Dissimilar inclusions: 20 percent S
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Limiting inclusions: Shallow soils
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Prime farmland: No Hydric soil: No
Page 104 and 105:
Organic layer: 0 to 2 inches—slig
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Land capability classification: 2w
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Surface runoff: Medium Depth to bed
Page 150 and 151:
Areas of bedrock escarpment Soil Su
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Wildlife Habitat Soil Survey of Lin
Page 168 and 169:
Hydric Soils Soil Survey of Lincoln
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 177 and 178:
Soil Properties Soil Survey of Linc
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183:
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Value—4 to 6 Chroma—3 to 8 Text
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
BA horizon: Hue—10YR Value—3 to
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Grigsby Series Soil Survey of Linco
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Bw horizon: Hue—10YR Value—4 or
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Bt horizon: Hue—7.5YR to 2.5Y Val
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
A horizon: Hue—10YR Value—3 to
Page 226 and 227: Soil Survey of Lincoln County, West
Page 243 and 244: References Soil Survey of Lincoln C
Page 245 and 246: Glossary Soil Survey of Lincoln Cou
Page 265 and 266: Tables Soil Survey of Lincoln Count
Page 275: Soil Survey of Lincoln County, West
Page 327 and 328:
Page 329 and 330:
Page 331 and 332:
Page 333 and 334:
Page 335 and 336:
Page 337 and 338:
Page 339 and 340:
Page 341 and 342:
Page 343 and 344:
Page 345 and 346:
Page 347 and 348:
Page 349 and 350:
Page 351 and 352:
Page 353 and 354:
Page 355 and 356:
Page 357 and 358:
Page 359 and 360:
Page 361 and 362:
Page 363 and 364:
Page 365 and 366:
Page 367 and 368:
Page 369 and 370:
Page 371 and 372:
Page 373 and 374:
Page 375 and 376:
Page 377 and 378:
Page 379 and 380:
Page 381 and 382:
Page 383 and 384:
Page 385 and 386:
Page 387 and 388:
Page 389 and 390:
Page 391 and 392:
Page 393 and 394:
Page 395 and 396:
Page 397 and 398:
Page 399 and 400:
Page 401 and 402:
Page 403 and 404:
Page 405 and 406:
Page 407 and 408:
Page 409 and 410:
Page 411 and 412:
Page 413 and 414:
Page 415 and 416:
Page 417 and 418:
Page 419 and 420:
Page 421 and 422:
Page 423 and 424:
Page 425 and 426:
Page 427 and 428:
Page 429 and 430:
Page 431 and 432:
419 Table 17.--Engineering Index Pr
Page 433 and 434:
Page 435 and 436:
Page 437 and 438:
Page 439 and 440:
Page 441 and 442:
Page 443 and 444:
Page 445 and 446:
Page 447 and 448:
Page 449 and 450:
Page 451 and 452:
439 Table 18.--Physical Properties
Page 453 and 454:
Page 455 and 456:
Page 457 and 458:
Page 459 and 460:
Page 461 and 462:
Page 463 and 464:
Page 465 and 466:
Page 467 and 468:
Page 469 and 470:
Page 471 and 472:
Page 473 and 474:
Page 475 and 476:
Page 477 and 478:
Page 479 and 480:
Page 481 and 482:
Page 483 and 484:
Page 485:
NRCS Accessibility Statement The Na
show all

Soil Survey of Lincoln County, West Virginia - Soil Data Mart - US ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?