Soil Survey of Lincoln County, West Virginia - Soil Data Mart - US ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Soil Survey of Lincoln County, West Virginia Table 9.--Forestland Productivity--Continued _________________________________________________________________________________ | Potential productivity | |___________________________________| Map symbol and | | | | soil name | Common trees |Site | Volume | Trees to manage | |index|of wood | | | | fiber | _________________________|____________________|_____|________|___________________ | | |cu ft/ac| | | | | VaC: | | | | Vandalia----------------|northern red oak----| 73 | 57 |black walnut, |Virginia pine-------| 70 | 114 | eastern white |yellow-poplar-------| 75 | 57 | pine, Virginia | | | | pine, yellow- | | | | poplar | | | | VnD: | | | | Vandalia----------------|northern red oak----| 73 | 57 |black walnut, |Virginia pine-------| 75 | 114 | eastern white |yellow-poplar-------| 83 | 72 | pine, Virginia | | | | pine, yellow- | | | | poplar | | | | VnE: | | | | Vandalia----------------|northern red oak----| 73 | 57 |black walnut, |Virginia pine-------| 75 | 114 | eastern white |yellow-poplar-------| 83 | 72 | pine, Virginia | | | | pine, yellow- | | | | poplar | | | | Yg: | | | | Yeager------------------|northern red oak----| 85 | 67 |eastern white pine, |sweetgum------------| 90 | 100 | northern red oak, |yellow-poplar-------| 90 | 86 | sweetgum, white | | | | oak, yellow-poplar _________________________|____________________|_____|________|___________________ 300
Soil Survey of Lincoln County, West Virginia Table 10a.--Forestland Management (The information in this table indicates the dominant soil condition but does not eliminate the need for onsite investigation. The numbers in the value columns range from 0.01 to 1.00. The larger the value, the greater the limitation. See text for further explanation of ratings in this table.) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ | | | | | | Limitations affecting | Suitability for | Soil rutting |Pct.| construction of haul | log landings | hazard Map symbol | of | roads and log landings | | and soil name |map |_________________________|_________________________|_________________________ |unit| Rating class and |Value| Rating class and |Value| Rating class and |Value | | limiting features | | limiting features | | limiting features | _____________________|____|___________________|_____|___________________|_____|___________________|_____ | | | | | | | AgB: | | | | | | | Allegheny-----------| 90 |Moderate | |Moderately suited | |Severe | | | Low strength |0.50 | Low strength |0.50 | Low strength |1.00 | | | | Slope |0.50 | | | | | | | | | AgC: | | | | | | | Allegheny-----------| 90 |Moderate | |Moderately suited | |Severe | | | Low strength |0.50 | Slope |0.50 | Low strength |1.00 | | | | Low strength |0.50 | | | | | | | | | BeD: | | | | | | | Beech---------------| 80 |Moderate | |Poorly suited | |Severe | | | Slope |0.50 | Slope |1.00 | Low strength |1.00 | | | | Low strength |0.50 | | | | | | | | | BeE: | | | | | | | Beech---------------| 70 |Moderate | |Poorly suited | |Severe | | | Slope |0.50 | Slope |1.00 | Low strength |1.00 | | | | Low strength |0.50 | | | | | | | | | BSF: | | | | | | | Berks---------------| 40 |Severe | |Poorly suited | |Severe | | | Slope |1.00 | Slope |1.00 | Low strength |1.00 | | Stoniness |0.50 | Rock fragments |0.50 | | | | Low strength |0.50 | Low strength |0.50 | | | | | | | | | Shelocta------------| 35 |Severe | |Poorly suited | |Severe | | | Slope |1.00 | Slope |1.00 | Low strength |1.00 | | Stoniness |0.50 | Rock fragments |0.50 | | | | Low strength |0.50 | Low strength |0.50 | | | | | | | | | CeF: | | | | | | | Cedarcreek----------| 70 |Severe | |Poorly suited | |Moderate | | | Slope |1.00 | Slope |1.00 | Low strength |0.50 | | Stoniness |0.50 | Rock fragments |0.50 | | | | | | | | | Rock outcrop--------| 15 |Not rated | |Not rated | |Not rated | | | | | | | | Ch: | | | | | | | Chagrin-------------| 75 |Severe | |Poorly suited | |Severe | | | Flooding |1.00 | Flooding |1.00 | Low strength |1.00 | | Low strength |0.50 | Low strength |0.50 | | | | | | | | | CoA: | | | | | | | Cotaco--------------| 80 |Moderate | |Moderately suited | |Severe | | | Low strength |0.50 | Low strength |0.50 | Low strength |1.00 | | Wetness |0.50 | | | | | | | | | | | CoB: | | | | | | | Cotaco--------------| 80 |Moderate | |Moderately suited | |Severe | | | Low strength |0.50 | Low strength |0.50 | Low strength |1.00 | | Wetness |0.50 | Slope |0.50 | | | | | | | | | 301
Page 1:
United States Department of Agricul
Page 4 and 5:
Soil Survey of Lincoln County, West
Page 6 and 7:
Page 8 and 9:
Page 11:
Foreword Soil Survey of Lincoln Cou
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27:
Siltstone Gilpin Gilpin-Upshur Mosh
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Dissimilar inclusions: 20 percent S
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Limiting inclusions: Shallow soils
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Prime farmland: No Hydric soil: No
Page 104 and 105:
Organic layer: 0 to 2 inches—slig
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Land capability classification: 2w
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Surface runoff: Medium Depth to bed
Page 150 and 151:
Areas of bedrock escarpment Soil Su
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Wildlife Habitat Soil Survey of Lin
Page 168 and 169:
Hydric Soils Soil Survey of Lincoln
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 177 and 178:
Soil Properties Soil Survey of Linc
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183:
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Value—4 to 6 Chroma—3 to 8 Text
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
BA horizon: Hue—10YR Value—3 to
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Grigsby Series Soil Survey of Linco
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Bw horizon: Hue—10YR Value—4 or
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Bt horizon: Hue—7.5YR to 2.5Y Val
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
A horizon: Hue—10YR Value—3 to
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
References Soil Survey of Lincoln C
Page 245 and 246:
Glossary Soil Survey of Lincoln Cou
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
Page 261 and 262: Soil Survey of Lincoln County, West
Page 265 and 266: Tables Soil Survey of Lincoln Count
Page 311: Soil Survey of Lincoln County, West
Page 363 and 364:
Page 365 and 366:
Page 367 and 368:
Page 369 and 370:
Page 371 and 372:
Page 373 and 374:
Page 375 and 376:
Page 377 and 378:
Page 379 and 380:
Page 381 and 382:
Page 383 and 384:
Page 385 and 386:
Page 387 and 388:
Page 389 and 390:
Page 391 and 392:
Page 393 and 394:
Page 395 and 396:
Page 397 and 398:
Page 399 and 400:
Page 401 and 402:
Page 403 and 404:
Page 405 and 406:
Page 407 and 408:
Page 409 and 410:
Page 411 and 412:
Page 413 and 414:
Page 415 and 416:
Page 417 and 418:
Page 419 and 420:
Page 421 and 422:
Page 423 and 424:
Page 425 and 426:
Page 427 and 428:
Page 429 and 430:
Page 431 and 432:
419 Table 17.--Engineering Index Pr
Page 433 and 434:
Page 435 and 436:
Page 437 and 438:
Page 439 and 440:
Page 441 and 442:
Page 443 and 444:
Page 445 and 446:
Page 447 and 448:
Page 449 and 450:
Page 451 and 452:
439 Table 18.--Physical Properties
Page 453 and 454:
Page 455 and 456:
Page 457 and 458:
Page 459 and 460:
Page 461 and 462:
Page 463 and 464:
Page 465 and 466:
Page 467 and 468:
Page 469 and 470:
Page 471 and 472:
Page 473 and 474:
Page 475 and 476:
Page 477 and 478:
Page 479 and 480:
Page 481 and 482:
Page 483 and 484:
Page 485:
NRCS Accessibility Statement The Na
show all

Soil Survey of Lincoln County, West Virginia - Soil Data Mart - US ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?