09.06.2013 Views

The dissemination of divination in roman republican times

The dissemination of divination in roman republican times

The dissemination of divination in roman republican times

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

preference for the high god category. But there were no significant differences <strong>in</strong> choices<br />

based on religious affiliation <strong>of</strong> the participants.<br />

It can be seen that there is a significant difference <strong>in</strong> the preference <strong>of</strong> the div<strong>in</strong>er based on<br />

the prestige <strong>of</strong> the associated counter<strong>in</strong>tuitive agent. This preference is here <strong>in</strong>terpreted to<br />

reflect a difference <strong>in</strong> the credibility <strong>of</strong> the div<strong>in</strong>ers. 81 Thus, prestige <strong>of</strong> the associated<br />

counter<strong>in</strong>tuitive agent has an effect on the perceived credibility <strong>of</strong> the div<strong>in</strong>er. Low <strong>in</strong>direct<br />

prestige gives lower credibility than high <strong>in</strong>direct prestige.<br />

Summary<br />

Interpretation moves from the perception <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>tention produced by ritualization to the<br />

recognition <strong>of</strong> these <strong>in</strong>tentional signs as communicative. Through the basic pr<strong>in</strong>ciple <strong>of</strong><br />

relevance used <strong>in</strong> normal everyday communication, the <strong>in</strong>terpreter <strong>in</strong>terprets the signs <strong>in</strong><br />

relation to the context given by the question. Div<strong>in</strong>ation however differs from normal<br />

communication <strong>in</strong> its sign <strong>in</strong>ventory be<strong>in</strong>g much more limited and <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>terpretation <strong>of</strong><br />

these signs as be<strong>in</strong>g much more “un-coded”. In general the relation between sign and<br />

mean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>div<strong>in</strong>ation</strong> is much looser than <strong>in</strong> normal communication. <strong>The</strong>re are also typically<br />

constra<strong>in</strong>ts on the possible subjects that are fit for a given <strong>div<strong>in</strong>ation</strong> practice and the form <strong>in</strong><br />

which answers can be given: Div<strong>in</strong>ation practices can give b<strong>in</strong>ary, discrete or rich answers.<br />

This has consequences for the utility <strong>of</strong> the <strong>div<strong>in</strong>ation</strong> practice. We also found that the<br />

credibility <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>terpretation depended on prestige. Two types <strong>of</strong> prestige were identified: a<br />

direct prestige from the proximate source. This may either be the operator, for example when<br />

the questioner himself <strong>in</strong>terprets, or the <strong>in</strong>terpreter. High prestige <strong>in</strong>dicates a higher<br />

credibility value. We also found an <strong>in</strong>direct prestige effect from the prestige <strong>of</strong> the ultimate<br />

source, the counter<strong>in</strong>tuitive agent.<br />

81 It might <strong>of</strong> course reflect someth<strong>in</strong>g else. It has been suggested to me by evolutionary<br />

psychologist Joseph Bulbulia (personal communication) that the size <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fer<strong>in</strong>gs may reflect<br />

costly signal<strong>in</strong>g. But it is not specified that it is the div<strong>in</strong>er who sacrifices. It may however, still be<br />

a possibility. To <strong>in</strong>vestigate this, further research is needed.<br />

104

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!