09.06.2013 Views

The dissemination of divination in roman republican times

The dissemination of divination in roman republican times

The dissemination of divination in roman republican times

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

l<strong>in</strong>ear regression analysis was made with degree <strong>of</strong> crisis as the <strong>in</strong>dependent variable and<br />

number <strong>of</strong> expiations as the dependent variable which didn't yield any significant relation<br />

(F(1,77)= 3.163, P=0.079). To be fair we could say that there is a trend. This trend may,<br />

however, just as well be attributed to the dramatic effect. If for example we removed the<br />

extreme observations from 218 and 217 <strong>in</strong> which the expiations play a central role for Livy <strong>in</strong><br />

evok<strong>in</strong>g the fear caused by Hannibal <strong>in</strong> Italy, the F value drops dramatically to<br />

F(1,75)=0.000, P=0.985, which is random. It does not therefore seem reasonable to conclude<br />

that there is any causal relation between crisis and number <strong>of</strong> expiations except <strong>in</strong> 218 and<br />

217. It seems that, <strong>in</strong> so far as it can be submitted to empirical tests, the predictions one<br />

would expect <strong>of</strong> the functional thesis do not fit the empirical f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs accurately.<br />

Summary<br />

This critical review has revealed review that all previous explanations <strong>of</strong> the existence <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>div<strong>in</strong>ation</strong> <strong>in</strong> the Roman Republic have serious flaws. We saw that it was possible to<br />

dist<strong>in</strong>guish four theses that had been <strong>of</strong>fered <strong>in</strong> previous research to expla<strong>in</strong> Roman<br />

<strong>div<strong>in</strong>ation</strong>. <strong>The</strong> historical thesis does not on closer <strong>in</strong>spection qualify as an explanation,<br />

because it merely demonstrates a correlation between events without supply<strong>in</strong>g any evidence<br />

<strong>of</strong> a causal relation. <strong>The</strong> formalist thesis is based on a misread<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the sources. <strong>The</strong> fear<br />

thesis likewise has problems with the empirical level s<strong>in</strong>ce it does not agree well with the<br />

predictions <strong>of</strong> the theory. <strong>The</strong> functional thesis has the same sort <strong>of</strong> problem as the historical<br />

thesis because it reverts to a correlational account, where it is not possible to isolate the<br />

causes and effects. In the only case where it was possible to test its predictions empirically, it<br />

could not account for the results. It is therefore possible to conclude that all previous attempts<br />

to expla<strong>in</strong> the existence <strong>of</strong> <strong>div<strong>in</strong>ation</strong> <strong>in</strong> Roman <strong>republican</strong> <strong>times</strong> have failed.<br />

137

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!