09.06.2013 Views

The dissemination of divination in roman republican times

The dissemination of divination in roman republican times

The dissemination of divination in roman republican times

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Indirect prestige <strong>The</strong> counter<strong>in</strong>tuitive agent is the god to whom the sacrifice is made and<br />

can therefore vary (Cic.Div.2.38, Liv.41.15.4). <strong>The</strong> status was therefore variable for each<br />

sacrifice, but it would <strong>of</strong>ten be high s<strong>in</strong>ce public sacrifice was given only to state gods.<br />

Utility and Credibility value <strong>The</strong> purpose <strong>of</strong> public extispicy was simply to ascerta<strong>in</strong><br />

whether the sacrifice was accepted or not. 165 If it was not accepted it could <strong>in</strong>dicate that the<br />

action to which the sacrifice perta<strong>in</strong>ed was wrong, but usually it would just lead to the<br />

repetition <strong>of</strong> the sacrifice. <strong>The</strong> situations <strong>in</strong> which we hear <strong>of</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> extispicy are<br />

primarily <strong>in</strong> the consular sacrifice when the consuls take up <strong>of</strong>fice (Liv.41.14.7), or before a<br />

new war (Liv.31.5.3) (Thul<strong>in</strong> 1912: 2454). We can see <strong>in</strong> the case <strong>of</strong> the consular sacrifice<br />

how the entrails were <strong>in</strong>terpreted. In Liv.31.5.7 we hear that the entrails were favorable<br />

(laeta), which was taken to mean that victory would be achieved 166 . It could be argued that<br />

this was an <strong>in</strong>terpretation that exceeded the right positive/negative answer postulated to<br />

operate <strong>in</strong> public extispicy (Pfiffig 1975: 120; Rasmussen 2003; Schill<strong>in</strong>g 1979). But this<br />

<strong>in</strong>terpretation is merely a reiteration <strong>of</strong> the contents <strong>of</strong> the prayer. 167 <strong>The</strong> victims sacrificed<br />

were great (hostiae maiorae), which <strong>in</strong>dicates a sacrifice to Jupiter. <strong>The</strong> mean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the<br />

sacrifice could then be <strong>in</strong>terpreted as a question to Jupiter about whether the consuls would<br />

succeed <strong>in</strong> w<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g the war <strong>in</strong> which they were to engage. <strong>The</strong> entrails gave affirmative<br />

signs, why they portended victory.<br />

We have some knowledge <strong>of</strong> the different mean<strong>in</strong>gs. Especially the so-called head <strong>of</strong> the<br />

liver (caput ioc<strong>in</strong>eris) (cf. Rasmussen 2003: 126) was especially significant. If it was double<br />

or big it was good (Liv. 27.26.13; Pl<strong>in</strong>.Nat.11.189; V.Max.1.6.9). If it was miss<strong>in</strong>g it was the<br />

worst sign (Cic.Div.2.32) and would surely lead to death (Pl<strong>in</strong>.Nat.11.189; Liv.41.14.7,<br />

27.26.13-14; Obs.17, 35, 47, 52, 55). If a small fissure was observed <strong>in</strong> the liver it was also a<br />

dire sign (Pl<strong>in</strong>.Nat.11.190); Cic.N.D.3.14; Cic.Div.1.16). Attention was also paid to the heart.<br />

If it was miss<strong>in</strong>g it was a bad sign (Pl<strong>in</strong>.Nat.11.186; Cic.Div.1.119). <strong>The</strong>se examples <strong>of</strong><br />

165 While this is the classical view go<strong>in</strong>g back to Wissowa, put most precisely by (Thul<strong>in</strong> 1906b: 5), some<br />

scholars do not accept a rigid dist<strong>in</strong>ction. This is based on the fact that the sources mix term<strong>in</strong>ology<br />

(Rasmussen 2003: 118; Schill<strong>in</strong>g 1979: 118). I th<strong>in</strong>k the follow<strong>in</strong>g examples <strong>of</strong> public use demonstrate that<br />

there is a rigid dist<strong>in</strong>ction between public and private use. <strong>The</strong> public is like the other forms <strong>of</strong> public<br />

<strong>div<strong>in</strong>ation</strong> a yes/no form, whereas the private can give richer <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g the future.<br />

166 (..)haruspices respondere laetaque exta fuisse et prolationem f<strong>in</strong>ium victoriamque et triumphum portendi<br />

(Liv.31.5.7)<br />

167 Quod senatus populusque Romanus de republica deque <strong>in</strong>eundo novo bello <strong>in</strong> animo haberet, ea res uti<br />

populo Romano sociisque ac nom<strong>in</strong>i Lat<strong>in</strong>o bene ac feliciter eveniret (Liv.31.5.4).<br />

168

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!