09.06.2013 Views

The dissemination of divination in roman republican times

The dissemination of divination in roman republican times

The dissemination of divination in roman republican times

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

formed a half-circle go<strong>in</strong>g from the South to the North. Possibly the field may have been<br />

further sub-divided <strong>in</strong>to a lower and higher part by the limit <strong>of</strong> the city wall, the pomerium<br />

(Valeton 1890: 246-248). <strong>The</strong> augur then put the lituus <strong>in</strong> his left hand and his right hand on<br />

the head <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>augurandus. He asked if Jupiter approved <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>augurandus, <strong>in</strong> which<br />

case he should send positive signs with<strong>in</strong> the formerly delimited area. Some birds gave<br />

positive or negative signs depend<strong>in</strong>g on which side <strong>of</strong> the field <strong>of</strong> vision they appeared on.<br />

For example a picus (woodpecker) and cornix (crow) <strong>in</strong> the left field were good or<br />

“admitt<strong>in</strong>g” birds and likewise a corvus (raven) and parra (screech-owl) <strong>in</strong> the right<br />

(Pl.As.259-261; Cic.Div.1.12). <strong>The</strong> cries <strong>of</strong> birds, like that <strong>of</strong> the owls called bubo and<br />

noctua were always bad signs. When a positive sign had been observed the <strong>in</strong>augurandus<br />

was declared a specific k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong> priest, he was to be, and stepped down.<br />

Ritualization <strong>The</strong> ritualization is established through the action <strong>of</strong> ask<strong>in</strong>g a question and<br />

then mark<strong>in</strong>g a field <strong>in</strong> the air <strong>in</strong> which birds are observed. Depend<strong>in</strong>g on their position and<br />

k<strong>in</strong>d, they give an answer to the question. No one is controll<strong>in</strong>g the birds to give the answers<br />

and the birds themselves do not speak or qualify as <strong>in</strong>tentional agents. This produces a<br />

deficiency <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tentional structure <strong>of</strong> the action. It is repaired through the context <strong>in</strong> which<br />

the birds are taken as answers from a hidden agent: Jupiter.<br />

Direct prestige S<strong>in</strong>ce only the augurs could perform the <strong>in</strong>auguratio, it is relatively easy to<br />

asses the prestige <strong>of</strong> the operator. <strong>The</strong> augural college was the second most prestigious<br />

priesthood. <strong>The</strong> known members <strong>of</strong> the college also held the highest political <strong>of</strong>fices<br />

(Szemler 1978: 2326; Szemler 1972: 184-186). Another <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g observation is that augurs<br />

could not have any physical abnormalities. This was one <strong>of</strong> the empirical markers <strong>of</strong><br />

prestigious <strong>in</strong>dividuals that we found above. Further they are male and comparatively old,<br />

which are other markers <strong>of</strong> prestige. <strong>The</strong> same is the case for all public priesthoods (Beard<br />

1990).<br />

Indirect prestige <strong>The</strong> associated counter<strong>in</strong>tuitive agent is Iupiter Optimus Maximus<br />

(Cic.Phil.13.12; Leg.2.20). 122 This can be seen explicitly <strong>in</strong> the text by Livy treated above,<br />

where the augur addresses Jupiter directly (Liv.1.18.9), and from the fact that the augurs are<br />

122 For sources and discussion see (Catalano 1960: 155; L<strong>in</strong>derski 1986: 2226f; Mommsen 1952: I, 77, n.2;<br />

Wissowa 1912: 119).<br />

146

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!