09.06.2013 Views

The dissemination of divination in roman republican times

The dissemination of divination in roman republican times

The dissemination of divination in roman republican times

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

objects and 6 made use <strong>of</strong> animals <strong>in</strong> the sign production. It still could be partly correct if the<br />

animal techniques were more credible, but out <strong>of</strong> the six practices with a high credibility<br />

value 3 are object techniques and 3 are animal and out <strong>of</strong> six practices with low credibility<br />

value 3 were object techniques and 3 were animal. <strong>The</strong> conclusion must therefore be that the<br />

category used <strong>in</strong> the sign production has no consequences for the credibility <strong>of</strong> <strong>div<strong>in</strong>ation</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />

Roman <strong>republican</strong> <strong>times</strong>. This also reflects back on the experiment. <strong>The</strong> results may be<br />

culture specific or they may measure someth<strong>in</strong>g else.<br />

Direct prestige<br />

<strong>The</strong> direct prestige was stipulated to be <strong>of</strong> great consequence to the credibility <strong>of</strong> the<br />

div<strong>in</strong>atory <strong>in</strong>formation. It was stipulated to work directly through the agent associated with<br />

the action, that is, the operator or <strong>in</strong> case where this differed, the <strong>in</strong>terpreter.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is an almost perfect correlation between direct prestige and credibility value. <strong>The</strong><br />

practices with the highest credibility values (auspices) were also reserved for the most<br />

prestigious <strong>in</strong>dividuals, the highest magistrates, and the practices with the lowest were<br />

performed by the least prestigious, <strong>of</strong>ten foreigners outside or below the Roman status<br />

system. Even with<strong>in</strong> practices the credibility value was divided. In the auspices the higher<br />

auspices belonged to the higher magistrates, and the lower to the lower magistrates. <strong>The</strong><br />

higher overruled the lower. We also see this result <strong>in</strong> practices that are used privately. For<br />

example we see the haruspices employed by the lowest stratum <strong>of</strong> society. <strong>The</strong>y were<br />

ridiculed and mocked by the elite. But the haruspices <strong>of</strong> the elite were employed by the<br />

greatest men <strong>of</strong> the Republic and their <strong>in</strong>terpretations were well respected and had a high<br />

credibility value.<br />

Indirect prestige<br />

It was also stipulated that the <strong>in</strong>direct prestige <strong>of</strong> the counter<strong>in</strong>tuitive agent correlates with the<br />

credibility value. <strong>The</strong> example <strong>of</strong> public extispicy however shows that although the public<br />

haruspices would <strong>of</strong>ten sacrifice to Jupiter the credibility value <strong>of</strong> their pronouncement was<br />

not high. Conversely, some<strong>times</strong> <strong>in</strong> private extispicy the entrails would give messages from<br />

Jupiter. This did not make the credibility value higher. <strong>The</strong> <strong>in</strong>direct prestige <strong>of</strong> the associated<br />

counter<strong>in</strong>tuitive agent is thus secondary to the direct prestige and seems to depend on it.<br />

178

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!