09.06.2013 Views

The dissemination of divination in roman republican times

The dissemination of divination in roman republican times

The dissemination of divination in roman republican times

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong>re could be no more favorable omen for the Roman people and army". 133 He then placed<br />

the poor pullarius <strong>in</strong> the front <strong>of</strong> the army, and even before the battle-shout a chance javel<strong>in</strong><br />

killed him. <strong>The</strong> battle ended with a glorious Roman victory. This story has the opposite<br />

outcome <strong>of</strong> the former which at first sight is strange. It is important to notice that the ritual<br />

was not performed properly s<strong>in</strong>ce the pullarius did not answer as he should have. It was his<br />

own <strong>in</strong>tention that determ<strong>in</strong>ed the pronunciation. Effectively it was therefore not an<br />

auspicium ex tripudio because the action was not ritualized. This does not mean that, had he<br />

given the correct pronunciation it would have went wrong, it means that no answer was<br />

obta<strong>in</strong>ed altogether. <strong>The</strong> death <strong>of</strong> the pullarius is attributed to his vitium (ritual fault). <strong>The</strong><br />

reason that the consul accepted the sign anyway was that the wrongful pronunciation was<br />

<strong>in</strong>stead taken as an omen <strong>of</strong> the impend<strong>in</strong>g victory, that is, an oblative sign (s<strong>in</strong>ce it was not<br />

impetrative). This is strengthened by the mention <strong>of</strong> a second omen: just before the battle a<br />

crow was giv<strong>in</strong>g a loud and dist<strong>in</strong>ct caw. 134<br />

In the first case we can see that the lack <strong>of</strong> efficacy <strong>of</strong> auspicium ex tripudio is attributed a<br />

lack <strong>of</strong> ritualization. In the second case the ritual was performed adequately, but the<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividual did not respond to its pronunciation. Both cases re<strong>in</strong>force the belief that auspicium<br />

ex tripudio produced true <strong>in</strong>formation and that it needed to be produced through ritualized<br />

action. In the third case the ritual was not performed correctly, which resulted <strong>in</strong> the death <strong>of</strong><br />

the assistant, who made the ritual transgression. And s<strong>in</strong>ce it was not performed properly it<br />

did not answer the question and was merely <strong>in</strong>conclusive.<br />

Direct prestige As far as can be seen from the sources, the auspicium ex tripudio is only<br />

used <strong>in</strong> military contexts. Only military commanders use it. <strong>The</strong>y were assisted by an<br />

assistant (pullarius), but his role is subord<strong>in</strong>ate. S<strong>in</strong>ce military commanders were generally<br />

from the elite but not always <strong>of</strong> consular rank, the direct prestige was very high. It is also<br />

worth to notice that <strong>in</strong> difference to auspicium de caelo or ex avibus, this form was not<br />

restricted to the consuls, but could be used by any commander <strong>of</strong> an army (Cic.Div.2.74).<br />

Indirect prestige <strong>The</strong> chickens were explicitly seen as messengers from Jupiter. 135<br />

133 ceterum qui auspicio adest, si quid falsi nuntiat, <strong>in</strong> semet ipsum religionem recipit; mihi quidem tripudium<br />

nuntiatum, populo Romano exercituique egregium auspicium est (Liv.10.40.11)<br />

134 Ante consulem haec dicentem corvus voce clara occ<strong>in</strong>uit (Liv.10.40.14)<br />

135 Haec suntigitur aves <strong>in</strong>ternuntiae Iovis (Cic.Div.2.72)<br />

156

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!