09.06.2013 Views

The dissemination of divination in roman republican times

The dissemination of divination in roman republican times

The dissemination of divination in roman republican times

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

spear which he had bought for his son’s service <strong>in</strong> the army was said to have blazed dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

day for more than two hours <strong>in</strong> such a way that the fire consumed none <strong>of</strong> it.” 207 From this<br />

passage previous research deduced two pr<strong>in</strong>ciples: a prodigy could not be accepted if it had<br />

occurred <strong>in</strong> a private (privatus) place and consequently had to be <strong>in</strong> a public (publicus) place. It<br />

could not either be accepted if it occurred <strong>in</strong> a foreign (peregr<strong>in</strong>us) place, it had to be <strong>in</strong> a Roman<br />

(<strong>roman</strong>us) place. 208 That is not altogether unreasonable assumptions. <strong>The</strong> problem is that it does<br />

not account for all the known prodigies, s<strong>in</strong>ce there are examples <strong>of</strong> prodigies occurr<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> both<br />

foreign and private places. Let us start with the private prodigies.<br />

Until recently it has been completely ignored that there are examples <strong>of</strong> private prodigies<br />

(Rasmussen 2003: 220; Rosenberger 1998: 29, n.52). A small number <strong>of</strong> prodigies occur <strong>in</strong><br />

houses which are private areas (Liv.41.16.6; Obs.51; Obs. 53). Another example <strong>of</strong> private<br />

prodigies is prodigies <strong>of</strong> hermaphrodites or monstrous births. <strong>The</strong>y must likewise have occurred<br />

on private ground (MacBa<strong>in</strong> 1982: 27). We can therefore conclude that the rule that prodigies<br />

had to occur <strong>in</strong> a public place is not a necessary rule, although it does fit most occurrences.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Romans did dist<strong>in</strong>guish between foreign land (ager peregr<strong>in</strong>us) and Roman land (ager<br />

Romanus), but the Romans also operated with many other categories <strong>in</strong> between that are difficult<br />

to put a clear juridical term on. <strong>The</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual relations between a city and Rome could be very<br />

different. Prodigies are reported from all these different categories <strong>of</strong> places. 209<br />

Attempts have been made to reconcile the discrepancy between the rule and the known<br />

prodigies. Franz Luterbacher thought that the dist<strong>in</strong>ction was just not very rigid (Luterbacher<br />

1967: 30). He has, though, been criticized for this s<strong>in</strong>ce it is an ad hoc explanation. Elizabeth<br />

Rawson expla<strong>in</strong>ed the discrepancy by stipulat<strong>in</strong>g that it came from the <strong>in</strong>tegration <strong>of</strong> local<br />

prodigy lists <strong>in</strong>to the Roman ones after the areas had become Roman (Rawson 1991a: 5-9).<br />

Unfortunately there is no evidence <strong>of</strong> such local collections. Bruce MacBa<strong>in</strong> th<strong>in</strong>ks that the<br />

207 Duo non suscepta prodigia sunt, alterum, quod <strong>in</strong> private loco factum esset, palmam enatam <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>pluvio suo T.<br />

Marcius Figulus nuntiabiat, alterum, quod <strong>in</strong> loco peregr<strong>in</strong>o; Fregellis <strong>in</strong> domo L.Atrei hasta, quam filio militia<br />

emerat, <strong>in</strong>terdiu plus duas horas arsisse, ita ut nihil eius ambureret ignis, dicebatur (Liv.43.13.6). <strong>The</strong>se two<br />

prodigies are listed at the end <strong>of</strong> the other prodigies <strong>of</strong> the year. <strong>The</strong>re are several puzzl<strong>in</strong>g features, most<br />

importantly that Livy or his source overlooks, as po<strong>in</strong>ted out by (Rasmussen 2003: 219-223), that they are both<br />

actually private prodigies.<br />

208 As demonstrated by Susanne William Rasmussen, this is still the most common view (Rasmussen 2003: 219-<br />

223)<br />

209 Bruce MacBa<strong>in</strong> has shown that 21 % <strong>of</strong> the prodigies from outside <strong>of</strong> Rome come from foreign land (MacBa<strong>in</strong><br />

1982: 25). For a thorough treatment <strong>of</strong> the question see (Szemler 1972: 34-36).<br />

210

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!