09.06.2013 Views

The dissemination of divination in roman republican times

The dissemination of divination in roman republican times

The dissemination of divination in roman republican times

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Direct prestige It is not stated who the operators <strong>of</strong> the sortition for <strong>of</strong>fices were. A guess<br />

would be either the elected <strong>of</strong>ficials or the presid<strong>in</strong>g magistrate. This <strong>in</strong>dicates a high level <strong>of</strong><br />

social status. Concern<strong>in</strong>g the selection <strong>of</strong> vestal virg<strong>in</strong>s, the operator was the pontifex<br />

maximus, who was the most prestigious priest <strong>in</strong> the Roman republic.<br />

Indirect prestige <strong>The</strong> counter<strong>in</strong>tuitive agent for the selection <strong>of</strong> tasks for the newly elected<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficials was putatively Iuppiter Optimus Maximus s<strong>in</strong>ce his temple was opened and the<br />

sortition apparel was stored there. He was the highest god <strong>in</strong> Rome. In other cases the identity<br />

<strong>of</strong> the counter<strong>in</strong>tuitive agent it is not explicitly stated.<br />

Utility and Credibility value Sortition can determ<strong>in</strong>e either a sequence or determ<strong>in</strong>e which<br />

<strong>of</strong> two or more alternatives is to be decided. Examples are: Allocation <strong>of</strong> duties to consuls,<br />

praetors, quaestors and military tribunes (cf. Stewart 1998), determ<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> sequence <strong>of</strong><br />

vot<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> election (Stewart 1998: 105-110) or <strong>of</strong> command among equal magistrates<br />

(Ehrenberg 1896), decision <strong>in</strong> cases <strong>of</strong> equal amount <strong>of</strong> votes 142 , some<strong>times</strong> appo<strong>in</strong>tment <strong>of</strong><br />

legates <strong>in</strong> late republic 143 , appo<strong>in</strong>tment <strong>of</strong> judges <strong>in</strong> the judicial process 144 , appo<strong>in</strong>tment <strong>of</strong><br />

Vestal virg<strong>in</strong>s. 145 <strong>The</strong> credibility value is <strong>in</strong>directly high, s<strong>in</strong>ce, for example, the duties <strong>of</strong> the<br />

consuls had great consequence for the Roman republic.<br />

History It probably came <strong>in</strong>to use <strong>in</strong> the early republic <strong>in</strong> the shift from autocratic to<br />

democratic rule. That would probably place it <strong>in</strong> the 6 th century where the expulsion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

k<strong>in</strong>gs and adoption <strong>of</strong> dual magistracy suddenly created the need for a way to decide the<br />

competences between equal magistrates (Cornell 1995: 226). <strong>The</strong> technique seems especially<br />

adapted to situations where a choice between two or more equal alternatives has to be made,<br />

and there is no superior authority to make it. <strong>The</strong> technique seems to have fallen <strong>in</strong>to disuse<br />

aga<strong>in</strong> at the highest level with the re<strong>in</strong>troduction <strong>of</strong> autocratic rule <strong>in</strong> the pr<strong>in</strong>cipate.<br />

Cultural model <strong>The</strong>re are some <strong>in</strong>dications that the allotment <strong>of</strong> prov<strong>in</strong>ces to magistrates<br />

was conceptualized as a decision made by Jupiter (cf. Stewart 1998).<br />

142 Cf. Cic.Planc.53, CIL.2.1964, but this was probably only <strong>in</strong> the late republic (Ehrenberg 1896: 1495).<br />

143 Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Tacitus this was an old tradition Tac.Hist.4.8.<br />

144 Probably not regularly until the time <strong>of</strong> Augustus Suet.Aug.29.1 (Ehrenberg 1896: 1495)<br />

145 For the procedure see Gel.1.12.11<br />

162

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!