09.06.2013 Views

The dissemination of divination in roman republican times

The dissemination of divination in roman republican times

The dissemination of divination in roman republican times

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

pieces <strong>of</strong> a calabash, his <strong>in</strong>formant Muchona expla<strong>in</strong>ed that it could mean: Water, marriage,<br />

any part <strong>of</strong> a calabash, cup, matril<strong>in</strong>eage, the th<strong>in</strong>gs a woman br<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong>to a marriage, beer,<br />

cassava mush with bad medic<strong>in</strong>e, grudge, a journey, collection <strong>of</strong> goods, a man’s possession,<br />

a person who has left because <strong>of</strong> a quarrel, horns with medic<strong>in</strong>es, and an assemblage (Turner<br />

1961: 58f). 70 This under-specification <strong>of</strong> the relation between sign and referent also makes<br />

the actual <strong>in</strong>terpretation less fixed and more open for later re<strong>in</strong>terpretation. This is, however,<br />

not generally the case for the b<strong>in</strong>ary techniques that merely denote a yes or a no.<br />

Nevertheless, even these cases require further <strong>in</strong>ferences that alter the mean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the orig<strong>in</strong>al<br />

sign (Garf<strong>in</strong>kel 1967; Zeitlyn 1990). Summ<strong>in</strong>g up, we can say that <strong>div<strong>in</strong>ation</strong> systems differ<br />

from l<strong>in</strong>guistic systems <strong>in</strong> that they are more “under-coded” and the relations between signs<br />

and mean<strong>in</strong>g are looser. This necessitates extra <strong>in</strong>ference and more possible mean<strong>in</strong>gs. 71<br />

Utility<br />

Compared to normal communication, the utility <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>formation produced <strong>in</strong> <strong>div<strong>in</strong>ation</strong><br />

practices is usually also restricted <strong>in</strong> different ways. In practice a given <strong>div<strong>in</strong>ation</strong> practice<br />

will usually be restricted by the form <strong>of</strong> the response and by the subjects it can answer. <strong>The</strong><br />

form <strong>of</strong> the answers can be either b<strong>in</strong>ary, discrete or rich. A b<strong>in</strong>ary response is an either/or<br />

answer. <strong>The</strong> discrete form works by select<strong>in</strong>g one possibility from a f<strong>in</strong>ite number <strong>of</strong> given<br />

possibilities and the rich form is a more elaborate form that allows for many details <strong>in</strong> the<br />

<strong>in</strong>terpretation. Some <strong>div<strong>in</strong>ation</strong> practices are very specialized and can answer questions about<br />

a very restricted range <strong>of</strong> subjects. I will call them restra<strong>in</strong>ed forms. Others are more open<br />

and all purpose. <strong>The</strong>se characteristics determ<strong>in</strong>e the utility <strong>of</strong> the <strong>div<strong>in</strong>ation</strong> practice. We can<br />

sketch the different possibilities <strong>in</strong> a two by three matrix (table 4.7.)<br />

Form<br />

B<strong>in</strong>ary Discrete Rich<br />

Subject<br />

Restra<strong>in</strong>ed Map<strong>in</strong>go Straws Astrology<br />

Open Poison oracle Ifa Palmistry<br />

Table 4.7 Utility characteristics <strong>of</strong> <strong>div<strong>in</strong>ation</strong> practices<br />

70 It should be stressed that taken out <strong>of</strong> context these mean<strong>in</strong>gs seem unnecessarily arcane. <strong>The</strong> explanations<br />

<strong>of</strong>fered by Muchona for all these mean<strong>in</strong>gs show clear signs <strong>of</strong> a lot <strong>of</strong> “<strong>in</strong>ference” which makes them<br />

understandable.<br />

71 Other differences could be added: whereas language has grammar, the “grammar” <strong>of</strong> <strong>div<strong>in</strong>ation</strong> is much<br />

more restricted. <strong>The</strong> basic conclusion is the same, that extra <strong>in</strong>ference is necessary.<br />

94

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!