09.06.2013 Views

The dissemination of divination in roman republican times

The dissemination of divination in roman republican times

The dissemination of divination in roman republican times

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Let us presently consider how hyperactive agency detection works accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

experimental psychologist Just<strong>in</strong> Barrett: Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Just<strong>in</strong> L. Barrett: “Part <strong>of</strong> the reason<br />

people believe <strong>in</strong> gods, ghosts and, gobl<strong>in</strong>s also comes from the way <strong>in</strong> which our m<strong>in</strong>ds,<br />

particularly our agency detection device (ADD) functions. Our ADD suffers from some<br />

hyperactivity, mak<strong>in</strong>g it prone to f<strong>in</strong>d agents around us, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g supernatural ones, given<br />

fairly modest evidence <strong>of</strong> their presence. This tendency encourages the generation and spread<br />

<strong>of</strong> god concepts” (Barrett 2004: 31). This is what he terms the Hyperactive Agency Detection<br />

Device or HADD (32). Examples <strong>of</strong> when the HADD is active <strong>in</strong>clude: Hear<strong>in</strong>g a bump <strong>in</strong><br />

the night (31), perception <strong>of</strong> geometric objects mov<strong>in</strong>g by themselves (32), perception <strong>of</strong> a<br />

wispy form (33), a computer malfunction<strong>in</strong>g (33), perception <strong>of</strong> crop circles (37). To this we<br />

might add all representations <strong>of</strong> “gods, ghosts and gobl<strong>in</strong>s”. I do want to add that Barrett does<br />

not say that the HADD is the whole story, he actually has several chapters expla<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g other<br />

important factors, but he does say that it is the central function.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to cognitive anthropologist Scott Atran and social psychologist Ara<br />

Norenzayan: “Widespread counterfactual and counter<strong>in</strong>tuitive beliefs <strong>in</strong> supernatural agents<br />

can be expla<strong>in</strong>ed by the fact that they “(..) trigger our naturally selected agency-detection<br />

system, which is trip-wired to respond to fragmentary <strong>in</strong>formation, <strong>in</strong>cit<strong>in</strong>g perception <strong>of</strong><br />

figures lurk<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> shadows and emotions <strong>of</strong> dread and awe” (Atran & Norenzayan 2004:<br />

714). While they call it the agency-detection system, it is the same basic explanation as<br />

Barrett gives for the HADD. Examples <strong>of</strong> when this system is active are: Dots mov<strong>in</strong>g on a<br />

screen, voices <strong>in</strong> the w<strong>in</strong>d, faces <strong>in</strong> the clouds, any complex design, the image <strong>of</strong> Mother<br />

<strong>The</strong>resa <strong>in</strong> a c<strong>in</strong>namon bun, the virg<strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong> Guadeloupe <strong>in</strong> a melted ice cream on the pavement,<br />

the Virg<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> w<strong>in</strong>dows, curta<strong>in</strong>s and television afterimages, the face <strong>of</strong> the Evil-One <strong>in</strong> the<br />

smoke <strong>of</strong> the World Trade Center (Atran & Norenzayan 2004: 719), sudden movement <strong>of</strong> an<br />

object stirred by the w<strong>in</strong>d, represent<strong>in</strong>g ghosts or gods (720). 56<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce belief <strong>in</strong> superhuman agents by these accounts qualify as uniquely human, all three<br />

po<strong>in</strong>ts mentioned above must apply to the HADD. Religion is considered a by-product <strong>of</strong><br />

human cognitive functions. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Barrett and Atran and Norenzayan the proper<br />

function 57 <strong>of</strong> the HADD was to detect and evade predators, the by-product is a susceptibility<br />

56 Atran and Norenzayan do have some other nuances than Barrett does and their explanation also<br />

<strong>in</strong>corporates emotions, but these are not relevant for the present purposes.<br />

57 I am us<strong>in</strong>g the notion <strong>of</strong> proper function <strong>in</strong> the sense given by the American philosopher Ruth Garrett<br />

Millikan (Millikan 1984: 28-33). Millikan has a longer philosophical justification for the term, but to put it<br />

83

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!