12.06.2013 Views

The Roman Army, 31 BC–AD 337: A Sourcebook

The Roman Army, 31 BC–AD 337: A Sourcebook

The Roman Army, 31 BC–AD 337: A Sourcebook

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> army in peacetime 119<br />

that have been decided; those who are showing dissension [shall be<br />

punished in accordance with] the decisions’. Valens: ‘<strong>The</strong> Anosseni<br />

request that they should be granted a soldier on police duty’. [Philocurius<br />

the procurator: ‘To guarantee (?)] the decisions I shall provide a soldier’.<br />

This is an extract from a document dealing with a dispute (continuing until AD<br />

237) between two villages in Asia, Anossa and Antimacheia, over contributions<br />

in animals, fodder, and carts, that they were obliged to make for people on<br />

official business using the local roads. <strong>The</strong>y belonged to an imperial estate and<br />

so were under the jurisdiction of a procurator. <strong>The</strong> initial hearing with the<br />

people of Anossa as the plaintiffs took place about AD 200 before the procurator,<br />

who ordered an optio to carry out his decision. At a further hearing in AD 213<br />

the people of Anossa seem to be complaining that the earlier decision was not<br />

being properly implemented; it is interesting that they ask for a soldier to be<br />

sent to them—it was not always the case that local communities wished to<br />

avoid contact with the military (below, pp. 170–80).<br />

189 Pliny (1st–2nd C.AD), Letters 10. 19–20<br />

Pliny to Emperor Trajan. I request, sir, that you guide me with your<br />

advice since I am uncertain whether I ought to employ public slaves of<br />

the local communities on prison guard duty, as has been the practice<br />

up to now, or use soldiers. For I am apprehensive that public slaves are<br />

not sufficiently reliable guards and on the other hand that a not<br />

inconsiderable number of soldiers would be detained on this duty. For<br />

the moment I have added a few soldiers to serve as guards with the<br />

public slaves. I see that there is a danger, however, that this very action<br />

will cause carelessness on both sides since they will be confident that<br />

each can direct the blame on to the other for any mistake for which<br />

they were both responsible.<br />

Trajan to Pliny. My dear Pliny, there is no need to transfer more<br />

fellow-soldiers to prison guard duty. We should adhere to the custom<br />

which pertains in that province, namely that prisons are guarded by<br />

public slaves. For it is your responsibility through your discipline and<br />

watchfulness to ensure that they carry out this duty reliably. <strong>The</strong> most<br />

important point is, as you say in your letter, the fear that if soldiers are<br />

mixed in with public slaves, both sides may become more neglectful of<br />

their duty by relying on each other. Moreover, we should adhere to the<br />

general rule that as few soldiers as possible should be diverted from<br />

military duties.<br />

As governor of Bithynia-Pontus, Pliny had some auxiliary troops under his<br />

command.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!