The Roman Army, 31 BC–AD 337: A Sourcebook
The Roman Army, 31 BC–AD 337: A Sourcebook
The Roman Army, 31 BC–AD 337: A Sourcebook
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>The</strong> army in peacetime 119<br />
that have been decided; those who are showing dissension [shall be<br />
punished in accordance with] the decisions’. Valens: ‘<strong>The</strong> Anosseni<br />
request that they should be granted a soldier on police duty’. [Philocurius<br />
the procurator: ‘To guarantee (?)] the decisions I shall provide a soldier’.<br />
This is an extract from a document dealing with a dispute (continuing until AD<br />
237) between two villages in Asia, Anossa and Antimacheia, over contributions<br />
in animals, fodder, and carts, that they were obliged to make for people on<br />
official business using the local roads. <strong>The</strong>y belonged to an imperial estate and<br />
so were under the jurisdiction of a procurator. <strong>The</strong> initial hearing with the<br />
people of Anossa as the plaintiffs took place about AD 200 before the procurator,<br />
who ordered an optio to carry out his decision. At a further hearing in AD 213<br />
the people of Anossa seem to be complaining that the earlier decision was not<br />
being properly implemented; it is interesting that they ask for a soldier to be<br />
sent to them—it was not always the case that local communities wished to<br />
avoid contact with the military (below, pp. 170–80).<br />
189 Pliny (1st–2nd C.AD), Letters 10. 19–20<br />
Pliny to Emperor Trajan. I request, sir, that you guide me with your<br />
advice since I am uncertain whether I ought to employ public slaves of<br />
the local communities on prison guard duty, as has been the practice<br />
up to now, or use soldiers. For I am apprehensive that public slaves are<br />
not sufficiently reliable guards and on the other hand that a not<br />
inconsiderable number of soldiers would be detained on this duty. For<br />
the moment I have added a few soldiers to serve as guards with the<br />
public slaves. I see that there is a danger, however, that this very action<br />
will cause carelessness on both sides since they will be confident that<br />
each can direct the blame on to the other for any mistake for which<br />
they were both responsible.<br />
Trajan to Pliny. My dear Pliny, there is no need to transfer more<br />
fellow-soldiers to prison guard duty. We should adhere to the custom<br />
which pertains in that province, namely that prisons are guarded by<br />
public slaves. For it is your responsibility through your discipline and<br />
watchfulness to ensure that they carry out this duty reliably. <strong>The</strong> most<br />
important point is, as you say in your letter, the fear that if soldiers are<br />
mixed in with public slaves, both sides may become more neglectful of<br />
their duty by relying on each other. Moreover, we should adhere to the<br />
general rule that as few soldiers as possible should be diverted from<br />
military duties.<br />
As governor of Bithynia-Pontus, Pliny had some auxiliary troops under his<br />
command.