The Roman Army, 31 BC–AD 337: A Sourcebook
The Roman Army, 31 BC–AD 337: A Sourcebook
The Roman Army, 31 BC–AD 337: A Sourcebook
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>The</strong> officers 61<br />
On the side of the stone is a longer inscription celebrating the devotion of Minicius<br />
Italus to Aquileia, which was probably his home town, and his personal intervention<br />
with Trajan on its behalf. After military service in Lower Germany, Italus rose to<br />
be procurator of Asia and then acting governor of the province, perhaps after the<br />
execution of the proconsul Sextus Vettulenus Civica Cerealis on the orders of<br />
Domitian in AD 88; he was in office as prefect of Egypt in AD 103.<br />
SENIOR OFFICERS<br />
Senators held the most important positions in the command of the<br />
<strong>Roman</strong> army. Although only one of the six military tribunes was of<br />
senatorial rank, each legion was commanded by a legatus legionis, a<br />
senator usually of praetorian status. In provinces where only one legion<br />
was stationed the commander of the legion was also provincial governor<br />
(with the exception of Africa where from the time of Gaius the command<br />
of the III Augusta was distinct from the civil administration of the<br />
province). Provinces containing several legions and auxiliary units were<br />
governed by a senator of consular rank who was supreme commander<br />
of all the troops therein. Usually these men had previously held at least<br />
one military tribuneship (normally in their early twenties) and legionary<br />
legateship (normally in their mid-thirties). Similarly if an army was<br />
assembled for a campaign, the senior commanders were senators of<br />
consular rank. Only Egypt, and after AD 198 the new province of<br />
Mesopotamia, were governed by equestrian prefects, although<br />
containing legionary troops.<br />
In their choice of commander emperors were therefore limited by<br />
traditional <strong>Roman</strong> respect for age, experience, and social standing, and<br />
the upper class ideal that senators were naturally competent to serve<br />
the state in whatever capacity it demanded. <strong>The</strong>re was no military<br />
academy in Rome and no systematic preparation of men for military<br />
command or for service say, as British or eastern specialists. Senators<br />
held a wide variety of posts, including many in civil administration,<br />
each one an individuality, and often with periods of inactivity. It is<br />
therefore debatable how many senators had significant experience of<br />
active service, or indeed how far this was a requirement for<br />
advancement. <strong>The</strong>n, the time spent by senators in command of an army<br />
was relatively short, since most held no more than two posts, up to six<br />
years in all. However, some senators did acquire long experience of<br />
military command, and over a limited period, most notably in the<br />
northern wars of Marcus Aurelius, a more concentrated effort was<br />
made to assemble and retain men of proven ability in senior commands.