The Roman Army, 31 BC–AD 337: A Sourcebook
The Roman Army, 31 BC–AD 337: A Sourcebook
The Roman Army, 31 BC–AD 337: A Sourcebook
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Veterans 201<br />
Recorded and authenticated from the bronze plaque which is affixed<br />
at Rome on the wall behind the temple of the divine Augustus at the<br />
statue (?) of Minerva.<br />
After discharge Secundus returned to his home town, Nicopolis ad Istrum,<br />
founded by Trajan, which explains his irregular tribe name, Ulpia. This town<br />
originally was part of Thrace but around AD 197 had been transferred by<br />
Septimius Severus to Lower Moesia for administrative purposes.<br />
All praetorians were of course <strong>Roman</strong> citizens and therefore did not require<br />
a grant of citizenship. <strong>The</strong> diplomas appear to suggest, however, that they were<br />
less privileged than veterans of the fleet and the auxilia, in that they received<br />
citizenship only for children born after discharge. Yet this seems improbable<br />
since the praetorian guard was the most privileged section of the army, and<br />
emperors were especially keen to keep its goodwill. Now, it is unlikely that<br />
there was any attempt at one moment to work out systematically all the rules<br />
of discharge and benefits. <strong>The</strong>refore at the start the government perhaps assumed<br />
that most praetorians would associate with Italian women, who were likely to<br />
be <strong>Roman</strong> citizens (especially when the guard was stationed in small Italian<br />
towns), and that children of such unions would be citizens, even if not legitimate.<br />
This attitude was then modified as problems arose, and in my view an ambiguous<br />
form of wording was employed on the diplomas, which could be taken as<br />
meaning that all children of praetorians were to be <strong>Roman</strong> citizens. So, in my<br />
translation ‘tollant’ in the original is expressed as ‘raise’ rather than ‘beget’,<br />
since the latter would make explicit that only children born after discharge<br />
could be citizens (Campbell 1984:439–45; exhaustive discussion in Link 1989).<br />
329 P.S.I. 1026=Smallwood NH 330, papyrus, Caesarea, Syria<br />
Palaestina, AD 150<br />
Recorded and authenticated from the petition published along with<br />
others in the portico of Junia [ _ _ _ ], in which was written the text<br />
which is written out below.<br />
To Vilius Cadus, legate of the Emperor with propraetorian power,<br />
from twenty-two veterans of Legion X Fretensis who began their<br />
military service in the consulship of Glabrio and Torquatus or in the<br />
consulship of Paulinus and Aquilinus (AD 124 and 125), and whose<br />
names are listed below. Since, sir, we served in the praetorian fleet at<br />
Misenum and then, after transfer to the Fretensis Legion through the<br />
generosity of the divine Hadrian, conducted ourselves over twenty<br />
[years] in every respect as good soldiers should, now indeed in these<br />
most felicitous times we have been discharged from our military oath<br />
and, as we are about to return to Egypt, to our native city of Alexandria,<br />
we ask and request that you should think it appropriate to affirm for<br />
us that we have been discharged by you, in order that it may be obvious