12.06.2013 Views

The Roman Army, 31 BC–AD 337: A Sourcebook

The Roman Army, 31 BC–AD 337: A Sourcebook

The Roman Army, 31 BC–AD 337: A Sourcebook

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Veterans 201<br />

Recorded and authenticated from the bronze plaque which is affixed<br />

at Rome on the wall behind the temple of the divine Augustus at the<br />

statue (?) of Minerva.<br />

After discharge Secundus returned to his home town, Nicopolis ad Istrum,<br />

founded by Trajan, which explains his irregular tribe name, Ulpia. This town<br />

originally was part of Thrace but around AD 197 had been transferred by<br />

Septimius Severus to Lower Moesia for administrative purposes.<br />

All praetorians were of course <strong>Roman</strong> citizens and therefore did not require<br />

a grant of citizenship. <strong>The</strong> diplomas appear to suggest, however, that they were<br />

less privileged than veterans of the fleet and the auxilia, in that they received<br />

citizenship only for children born after discharge. Yet this seems improbable<br />

since the praetorian guard was the most privileged section of the army, and<br />

emperors were especially keen to keep its goodwill. Now, it is unlikely that<br />

there was any attempt at one moment to work out systematically all the rules<br />

of discharge and benefits. <strong>The</strong>refore at the start the government perhaps assumed<br />

that most praetorians would associate with Italian women, who were likely to<br />

be <strong>Roman</strong> citizens (especially when the guard was stationed in small Italian<br />

towns), and that children of such unions would be citizens, even if not legitimate.<br />

This attitude was then modified as problems arose, and in my view an ambiguous<br />

form of wording was employed on the diplomas, which could be taken as<br />

meaning that all children of praetorians were to be <strong>Roman</strong> citizens. So, in my<br />

translation ‘tollant’ in the original is expressed as ‘raise’ rather than ‘beget’,<br />

since the latter would make explicit that only children born after discharge<br />

could be citizens (Campbell 1984:439–45; exhaustive discussion in Link 1989).<br />

329 P.S.I. 1026=Smallwood NH 330, papyrus, Caesarea, Syria<br />

Palaestina, AD 150<br />

Recorded and authenticated from the petition published along with<br />

others in the portico of Junia [ _ _ _ ], in which was written the text<br />

which is written out below.<br />

To Vilius Cadus, legate of the Emperor with propraetorian power,<br />

from twenty-two veterans of Legion X Fretensis who began their<br />

military service in the consulship of Glabrio and Torquatus or in the<br />

consulship of Paulinus and Aquilinus (AD 124 and 125), and whose<br />

names are listed below. Since, sir, we served in the praetorian fleet at<br />

Misenum and then, after transfer to the Fretensis Legion through the<br />

generosity of the divine Hadrian, conducted ourselves over twenty<br />

[years] in every respect as good soldiers should, now indeed in these<br />

most felicitous times we have been discharged from our military oath<br />

and, as we are about to return to Egypt, to our native city of Alexandria,<br />

we ask and request that you should think it appropriate to affirm for<br />

us that we have been discharged by you, in order that it may be obvious

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!