12.06.2013 Views

The Roman Army, 31 BC–AD 337: A Sourcebook

The Roman Army, 31 BC–AD 337: A Sourcebook

The Roman Army, 31 BC–AD 337: A Sourcebook

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

9 <strong>The</strong> army in the later empire<br />

<strong>The</strong> political and military dislocation, and the economic and social upheaval<br />

in the fifty years after the murder of Severus Alexander in AD 235 had<br />

such an effect on the propertied élite that subsequent writers looked back<br />

with nostalgia to the thirteen years of that feeble emperor’s inept rule as a<br />

kind of golden age. Significantly, one of the fictitious claims in the literary<br />

account of Alexander was that he was a strict military disciplinarian. In<br />

the face of foreign invasion and internal secession, men recognized the<br />

need for an emperor who could command the respect of an army and lead<br />

effectively in person. Not only had the balance between the civil and military<br />

leader shifted irrevocably towards the military side, but leadership and<br />

inspiration were also needed wherever incursions had to be repelled. All<br />

these factors contributed to the large number of usurpations which were a<br />

feature of this period. However, contemporary writers, doubtless much<br />

influenced by the views of their own class which had most to lose from the<br />

disruption, perhaps exaggerated the effects, which may have appeared<br />

only gradually; moreover the knowledge of writers was probably localized,<br />

and the situation may not have been uniformly disastrous. Indeed there is<br />

some reason to emphasize the resilience of the empire’s economic and<br />

social structures in these years (see Whittaker 1976).<br />

Above all, the army remained an essential bulwark of <strong>Roman</strong><br />

civilization and a vital factor in future recovery; the basic organization<br />

of legions and auxilia stationed in the provinces remained intact;<br />

territorial loss was confined to Mesopotamia, Dacia, and the Agri<br />

Decumates between the Rhine and Danube; despite repeated civil wars<br />

the army was still able to win battles against outside foes. And<br />

presumably the process of recruiting, feeding, equipping, and paying<br />

the troops must have continued, although we know little of it. In certain<br />

respects the army became stronger, as several emperors, notably<br />

Gallienus (AD 253–68) and Aurelian (AD 270–5), attempted to adapt

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!