The Roman Army, 31 BC–AD 337: A Sourcebook
The Roman Army, 31 BC–AD 337: A Sourcebook
The Roman Army, 31 BC–AD 337: A Sourcebook
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
156 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Roman</strong> <strong>Army</strong><br />
opinion I gave yesterday. Whether this man served in a legion, a cohort,<br />
or an ala, the child born to him could not be his legitimate son; moreover,<br />
since he is not the legitimate son of his father, who is an Alexandrian<br />
citizen, he cannot be an Alexandrian citizen. <strong>The</strong>refore this boy, who<br />
was born to Valens while he was serving in a cohort, is his illegitimate<br />
son and cannot be admitted to Alexandrian citizenship’. And he added:<br />
‘You said yesterday that you had other sons; what ages are they, when<br />
were they born?’ Octavius Valens replied: ‘One recently, the other is<br />
older’. Eudaemon said: ‘Where were you serving when the older boy<br />
was born?’ Valens replied: ‘In the cohort, and the little one too’.<br />
Eudaemon said: ‘You must know that they are in the same situation as<br />
this one. <strong>The</strong>re are some things which cannot be changed.’ Valens said:<br />
‘Now, if I manage to go abroad you yourself could sign my petition, so<br />
that I may obtain my rights through a legal representative. What wrong<br />
have the children committed?’ Eudaemon said: ‘I have been foolish in<br />
explaining in detail what I could have said in a few words; what you<br />
are attempting is impossible, and neither this boy nor your other sons<br />
are citizens of Alexandria’.<br />
This case illustrates the problems caused by the ambivalent attitude of the<br />
government which tolerated the unofficial unions of soldiers but compelled its<br />
officials to enforce the legal consequences. <strong>The</strong>re was a conflict between the<br />
duty of the prefect and the feelings of the soldier, who genuinely believed that<br />
he was married. Even if the children in question were <strong>Roman</strong> citizens, possession<br />
of Alexandrian citizenship would be desirable in that it conferred certain<br />
privileges.<br />
258 Pliny (1st–2nd C.AD), Letters 10. 106–7<br />
Pliny to Emperor Trajan. Since I was asked, sir, by Publius Accius Aquila,<br />
a centurion of the sixth part-mounted cohort, to forward to you a<br />
petition in which he entreats you to show your benevolence in respect<br />
of the citizen status of his daughter, I thought that it would be harsh to<br />
deny his request since I know how willingly and sympathetically you<br />
respond to appeals from the soldiers.<br />
Trajan to Pliny. I have read the petition you forwarded on behalf of<br />
Publius Accius Aquila, centurion of the sixth part-mounted cohort. I<br />
have been moved by his appeal and have granted <strong>Roman</strong> citizenship to<br />
his daughter. I have sent to you his petition duly annotated which you<br />
can give to him.<br />
Trajan is here conceding a privilege normally granted to auxiliary soldiers after<br />
twenty-five years’ service, or on discharge (see p. 193); this is particularly striking