The Roman Army, 31 BC–AD 337: A Sourcebook
The Roman Army, 31 BC–AD 337: A Sourcebook
The Roman Army, 31 BC–AD 337: A Sourcebook
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>The</strong> army in the later empire 237<br />
383 Lactantius (3rd–4th C.AD), On the Deaths of the<br />
Persecutors 7. 2<br />
Through his greed and fear he (Diocletian) overturned the entire world.<br />
He appointed three men to share his rule, with the result that the world<br />
was divided into four parts and the armies multiplied, since each one<br />
of the emperors struggled to keep a much larger number of soldiers<br />
than any previous emperor had had when he was administering the<br />
state alone. <strong>The</strong> number of people who were recipients began to<br />
outnumber contributors, to such an extent that the substance of the<br />
farmers was consumed by the enormity of the requisitions, fields were<br />
abandoned and arable land was turned into woodland. Furthermore,<br />
to ensure that terror permeated everywhere, the provinces too were<br />
divided into chunks; many governors and even more officials were set<br />
over individual areas, indeed virtually over individual communities;<br />
there were also many accountants, and controllers, and deputies of the<br />
prefects, among all of whom civil behaviour was a rarity; instead there<br />
were only numerous condemnations and confiscations, and exactions<br />
of countless resources which were not merely frequent but incessant,<br />
and led to insufferable abuse. Moreover, the methods for raising troops<br />
were intolerable.<br />
By contrast to Zosimus, Lactantius gives, from the Christian standpoint, a<br />
critical opinion of Diocletian’s reforms in the army and administration, and in<br />
particular the exactions required to finance them. Although he is a hostile<br />
witness, he gives us a valuable contemporary reaction to changes which he<br />
believed were very painful to many sections of society. It is true that Lactantius<br />
cannot be right to suggest that the army was quadrupled, but other evidence<br />
indicates the strength of the Severan army was at least doubled (Duncan-Jones<br />
1978; MacMullen 1980).<br />
384 Act of Maximilianus 2. 8–9 (Musurillo 1972:17), AD 295<br />
Dion (proconsul of Africa) said: ‘Think about your youth and serve in<br />
the army. This is the right course of action for a young man’.<br />
Maximilian replied: ‘My service is for my Lord. I cannot serve the<br />
world. I have already stated this, I am a Christian’.<br />
Dion the proconsul said: ‘In the sacred retinue (comitatus) of our<br />
lords Diocletian and Maximian, Constantius and Maximus, there are<br />
soldiers who are Christians, and they serve’.<br />
Maximilian said: ‘<strong>The</strong>y themselves know what is right for them. I,<br />
however, am a Christian and I cannot do evil’.<br />
For the context see text no. 5. <strong>The</strong> comitatus suggests a field force in attendance