12.06.2013 Views

The Roman Army, 31 BC–AD 337: A Sourcebook

The Roman Army, 31 BC–AD 337: A Sourcebook

The Roman Army, 31 BC–AD 337: A Sourcebook

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> army in the later empire 237<br />

383 Lactantius (3rd–4th C.AD), On the Deaths of the<br />

Persecutors 7. 2<br />

Through his greed and fear he (Diocletian) overturned the entire world.<br />

He appointed three men to share his rule, with the result that the world<br />

was divided into four parts and the armies multiplied, since each one<br />

of the emperors struggled to keep a much larger number of soldiers<br />

than any previous emperor had had when he was administering the<br />

state alone. <strong>The</strong> number of people who were recipients began to<br />

outnumber contributors, to such an extent that the substance of the<br />

farmers was consumed by the enormity of the requisitions, fields were<br />

abandoned and arable land was turned into woodland. Furthermore,<br />

to ensure that terror permeated everywhere, the provinces too were<br />

divided into chunks; many governors and even more officials were set<br />

over individual areas, indeed virtually over individual communities;<br />

there were also many accountants, and controllers, and deputies of the<br />

prefects, among all of whom civil behaviour was a rarity; instead there<br />

were only numerous condemnations and confiscations, and exactions<br />

of countless resources which were not merely frequent but incessant,<br />

and led to insufferable abuse. Moreover, the methods for raising troops<br />

were intolerable.<br />

By contrast to Zosimus, Lactantius gives, from the Christian standpoint, a<br />

critical opinion of Diocletian’s reforms in the army and administration, and in<br />

particular the exactions required to finance them. Although he is a hostile<br />

witness, he gives us a valuable contemporary reaction to changes which he<br />

believed were very painful to many sections of society. It is true that Lactantius<br />

cannot be right to suggest that the army was quadrupled, but other evidence<br />

indicates the strength of the Severan army was at least doubled (Duncan-Jones<br />

1978; MacMullen 1980).<br />

384 Act of Maximilianus 2. 8–9 (Musurillo 1972:17), AD 295<br />

Dion (proconsul of Africa) said: ‘Think about your youth and serve in<br />

the army. This is the right course of action for a young man’.<br />

Maximilian replied: ‘My service is for my Lord. I cannot serve the<br />

world. I have already stated this, I am a Christian’.<br />

Dion the proconsul said: ‘In the sacred retinue (comitatus) of our<br />

lords Diocletian and Maximian, Constantius and Maximus, there are<br />

soldiers who are Christians, and they serve’.<br />

Maximilian said: ‘<strong>The</strong>y themselves know what is right for them. I,<br />

however, am a Christian and I cannot do evil’.<br />

For the context see text no. 5. <strong>The</strong> comitatus suggests a field force in attendance

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!