12.06.2013 Views

The Roman Army, 31 BC–AD 337: A Sourcebook

The Roman Army, 31 BC–AD 337: A Sourcebook

The Roman Army, 31 BC–AD 337: A Sourcebook

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

190 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Roman</strong> <strong>Army</strong><br />

disgraceful and unbounded craving for money, while despising any<br />

feelings of respect for their emperors. Since there was no one to take<br />

any action against the soldiers who had cold-bloodedly murdered an<br />

emperor, or to prevent the outrageous auction and sale of the imperial<br />

power, this was a major reason for the disgraceful state of disobedience<br />

that was to persist in the years to come. <strong>The</strong> soldiers’ steadily increasing<br />

lust for money and contempt for their leaders had culminated in the<br />

shedding of blood.<br />

Herodian was probably writing in the first half of the third century AD, and<br />

had held some public offices, though it is not clear if he was of senatorial or<br />

equestrian rank. He is incorrect in asserting that this was the first time the<br />

soldiers were bribed, since in a sense this had been true since the time of Augustus,<br />

and of course Claudius had paid a huge donative to the praetorians. But he is<br />

right to emphasize that to induce soldiers to break their military oath created a<br />

bad example and made it more difficult to guard against military anarchy.<br />

<strong>31</strong>5 Petrus Patricius, Exc. Vat. 152 (excerpt from Dio’s history—<br />

Loeb Dio, vol. 9, p. 470)<br />

<strong>The</strong> False Antoninus (Elagabalus—AD 218–22) was despised and killed<br />

by the soldiers. For when people, especially if armed, have got used to<br />

despising their rulers, they place no limit on their power to do whatever<br />

they like, but keep their weapons to use against the very person who<br />

gave them this power.<br />

<strong>31</strong>6 Dio, 80. 2<br />

Ulpian (praetorian prefect) corrected many of the wrongs perpetrated<br />

by Sardanapalus (another name for Elagabalus), but after he had killed<br />

Flavianus and Chrestus so that he could succeed to their position, he<br />

himself was murdered not long afterwards by the praetorians, who<br />

attacked him during the night, even though he fled to the palace and<br />

took refuge with the emperor himself (Severus Alexander) and his<br />

mother. Indeed, even while he was alive, there was a substantial<br />

disturbance between the people and the praetorians which arose from<br />

some small cause and which resulted in a battle between them lasting<br />

three days with many dead on both sides. Since the soldiers were coming<br />

off worse, they turned their attention to setting fire to buildings, and<br />

for this reason the people, fearing that the entire city might be destroyed,<br />

reluctantly came to an agreement with them. In addition to these<br />

incidents, Epagathus, who was considered to be mainly responsible for<br />

the murder of Ulpian, was sent to Egypt, to all appearances as governor

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!