12.06.2013 Views

The Roman Army, 31 BC–AD 337: A Sourcebook

The Roman Army, 31 BC–AD 337: A Sourcebook

The Roman Army, 31 BC–AD 337: A Sourcebook

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> army, the local community, the law 153<br />

us, her son, who lived six years, three months, twenty days, and<br />

Campania Dubitata, her mother, who lived fifty years. Julius Maximus,<br />

senior treasurer (?) of the ala of Sarmatians, her husband, erected this<br />

memorial to his incomparable wife, and to his son who was extremely<br />

devoted to his father, and to his most resolute mother-in-law.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se funeral inscriptions are cited to show the desire among ordinary soldiers<br />

for female companionship and normal family life, although only text no. 251<br />

is securely dated to the period before the marriage ban was removed.<br />

254 Bowman and Thomas 1987:137–40, tablet, Vindolanda,<br />

Britain, c. AD 100–105<br />

Claudia Severa to her Lepidina, greetings.<br />

I cordially invite you, sister, to make sure that you come to us on 11<br />

September for the day of the celebration of my birthday, since if you<br />

come you will make the day more pleasant for me by your arrival.<br />

Pass on my best wishes to your Cerialis. My Aelius and my little son<br />

send [you (?)] their greetings.<br />

(Second hand) I shall expect you, sister. Be well, sister, my dearest<br />

love, and so may I be, and hail.<br />

(On the back, third hand ?) To Sulpicia Lepidina, (wife) of Flavius<br />

Cerialis, from Severa.<br />

<strong>The</strong> author of the letter, Claudia Severa, was married to Aelius Bocchus who is<br />

likely to have been the commander of a military unit in north Britain; Lepidina<br />

was probably the wife of Flavius Cerialis, who was the prefect of one of the<br />

cohorts stationed at Vindolanda (Bowman and Thomas 1987:129–30). <strong>The</strong>re<br />

was no restriction on the marriage of equestrian officers in the army, and this<br />

letter is good evidence for the presence of wives and children in army quarters,<br />

and the nature of camp life in Britain some sixty years after the conquest.<br />

255 Dio (2nd–3rd C.AD), 60. 24<br />

He (Claudius) granted the privileges of married men to the soldiers<br />

(AD 44), since they were not legally permitted to have wives.<br />

Claudius was presumably granting not the privileges accorded to married men<br />

with children, which were inappropriate, but formal exemption from the penalties<br />

imposed by Augustus’ legislation on the unmarried and childless; it was an<br />

anomaly if these had been applied to soldiers who were forbidden to marry.<br />

256 BGU 1690=FIRA 3. 5, papyrus, Philadelphia, Egypt, AD 1<strong>31</strong><br />

Epimachus, son of Longinus, soldier of the second cohort of <strong>The</strong>bans,<br />

century of Octavius Alexander [affirmed _ _ _ ] that a daughter,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!