12.06.2013 Views

The Roman Army, 31 BC–AD 337: A Sourcebook

The Roman Army, 31 BC–AD 337: A Sourcebook

The Roman Army, 31 BC–AD 337: A Sourcebook

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6 <strong>The</strong> army, the local community,<br />

and the law<br />

SOLDIERS IN LOCAL LIFE<br />

By the late second century, legionary and auxiliary troops were<br />

permanently stationed in nineteen provinces, while in many others<br />

smaller detachments of auxiliaries were regularly based. Moreover,<br />

individual soldiers or detachments were frequently in transit, and<br />

sometimes the emperor himself, with an entire army. From the presence<br />

of 400,000 soldiers in the provinces there were many potential benefits<br />

and also dangers for local communities, especially those situated near<br />

main roads.<br />

<strong>The</strong> location of the army in separate provinces, and often in different<br />

bases within one province, meant that there was no overall system of<br />

army supply. Markets will have been stimulated, since the soldiers<br />

needed grain, foodstuffs, meat, wine, iron, timber, building materials,<br />

replacement draught animals and horses, leather, and clothing. <strong>The</strong><br />

army was not self-sufficient, though soldiers did produce a wide range<br />

of manufactured goods and used the legion’s territorium (an area of<br />

land allocated to a legion in the vicinity of its base) for limited growing<br />

of crops and pasturing of animals. It has been calculated that 300,000<br />

soldiers would require about 100,000 tonnes of wheat annually,<br />

(including an additional allocation for cavalrymen), rising to 150,000<br />

tonnes by the end of the second century with the increase in army<br />

numbers (Garnsey and Saller 1987:88–95). Most bulk supplies would<br />

be brought to the camps from the immediate locality or over relatively<br />

short distances, and the presence of so many grain consumers should<br />

have had an impact on the rather static agricultural set-up of local<br />

communities, and may have encouraged the production of more grain,<br />

though this is difficult to demonstrate. <strong>The</strong>re was certainly considerable<br />

potential for profit since by no means all the grain for army use was in<br />

the form of taxes or rents in kind.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!