12.06.2013 Views

The Roman Army, 31 BC–AD 337: A Sourcebook

The Roman Army, 31 BC–AD 337: A Sourcebook

The Roman Army, 31 BC–AD 337: A Sourcebook

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

158 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Roman</strong> <strong>Army</strong><br />

property in accordance with that part of the edict that allows a claim<br />

to relatives by birth. It will be your duty to make this benefaction of<br />

mine known both to my soldiers and to the veterans, not in order that<br />

I may appear to be extolled among them, but so that they may make<br />

use of this if they do not know about it.<br />

This letter deals with intestate succession, in which illegitimate children normally<br />

had no claim. <strong>The</strong> munificent tone of the letter suggests that Hadrian was<br />

referring to all children of soldiers, not merely those who were <strong>Roman</strong> citizens.<br />

However there were legal limitations to the concession in that it was associated<br />

with the edict’s provision for claims by blood relatives; therefore the claims of<br />

illegitimate children would be preceded by those of legitimate children and<br />

agnates (i.e. people descended through the male line, for example, a brother or<br />

father). Nevertheless, Hadrian’s letter was a further move towards the<br />

recognition of military marriages, and its tone emphasizes his personal<br />

responsibility and good will towards his soldiers, which he takes as sufficient<br />

reason to condone a breach of military regulations.<br />

261 CJ 9. 9. 15, AD 242<br />

<strong>The</strong> same Emperor (Gordian) to Hilarianus, soldier. If your former wife<br />

left the province before she could be accused of adultery, an accusation<br />

cannot be brought in her absence, and it is not legally proper to demand<br />

that she be brought back to that province in which you are serving as a<br />

soldier. But you will certainly be able to bring a formal accusation against<br />

her when your military duties permit. For the time which you have given<br />

to your military obligations should not deprive you of the retribution<br />

which you demand for the grief inflicted on you as a husband. Published<br />

on 12 March, in the consulship of Atticus and Praetextatus.<br />

This rescript illustrates the legally valid marriage of soldiers after the Severan<br />

era, since adultery can occur only in the context of a iustum matrimonium<br />

(Campbell 1978:159–66). This story of a failed personal relationship reminds<br />

us that soldiers lived in the same world as civilians and indeed faced additional<br />

problems because of their military duties. <strong>The</strong> emperor is sympathetic while<br />

upholding the normal legal process.<br />

262 FIRA 3. 47, papyrus, Egypt, AD 142<br />

Antonius Silvanus, cavalryman of the first Mauretanian ala of Thracians,<br />

aide (stator) of the prefect, troop of Valerius, made his will. Let my son,<br />

Marcus Antonius Satrianus, be the sole heir of all my property, both<br />

military and civilian. Let all others be disinherited. And let him formally<br />

accept my inheritance within the first hundred days (after my death). If

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!