12.06.2013 Views

The Roman Army, 31 BC–AD 337: A Sourcebook

The Roman Army, 31 BC–AD 337: A Sourcebook

The Roman Army, 31 BC–AD 337: A Sourcebook

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

186 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Roman</strong> <strong>Army</strong><br />

the undivided support of the praetorians could hardly inspire confidence in his<br />

capacity to rule. It became more difficult to arrange things so that this was<br />

done discreetly, since the accessions of Claudius and Nero highlighted the<br />

practical, overwhelming power of the army. But the support of the senate,<br />

expressed in its decree, was not negligible, and later Nero could speak of the<br />

‘authority of the senators’ and the ‘agreement of the soldiers’ (Annals, 13. 4).<br />

308 Tacitus, Histories 1. 4<br />

<strong>The</strong> death of Nero had been greeted at first with a wave of delight, but<br />

it had also stirred up different emotions not only in Rome among the<br />

senators, the people, and the soldiers in the capital, but also among all<br />

the legions and their commanders, since a secret of empire had been<br />

revealed—an emperor could be created outside Rome.<br />

<strong>The</strong> civil wars of AD 68–69 brought an abrupt end to the long-established<br />

Julio-Claudian dynasty. For nearly one hundred years the succession had been<br />

regulated inside the imperial family with the help of the praetorian guard. <strong>The</strong><br />

success of the governor of Spain, Sulpicius Galba, in seizing power in 68, brought<br />

the legionaries in the provinces dramatically to the forefront, demonstrated the<br />

helplessness of the senate and the inadequacy of the praetorians as a defence<br />

against an invasion of Italy by a provincial army, and substantially reduced the<br />

influence of the guard until the reign of Commodus. <strong>The</strong> example set by Galba<br />

was immediately followed by Vitellius, and then by Vespasian, who was to<br />

place the day of his assumption of power on 1 July AD 69, the day on which he<br />

had been acclaimed by the troops in Egypt, rather than on the day in late<br />

December AD 69, when his powers were formally voted by the senate (for the<br />

civil wars and the role of the army, see Campbell 1984:365–74).<br />

309 Dio, 64. 9<br />

People hated him (Otho) especially because he had revealed that the<br />

position of emperor could be bought, and had put Rome in thrall to<br />

the most audacious men; moreover, he placed no value on the senate<br />

and people and had indeed persuaded the soldiers that they could both<br />

kill and create an emperor.<br />

<strong>31</strong>0 SB 10295, with Bowman 1970, papyrus, Oxyrhynchus,<br />

AD 175 (?)<br />

Alexandrians [ _ _ _ ] you carry goodwill towards me [ _ _ _ ] in your<br />

hearts and remain steadfast in your opinions. I am [therefore] coming<br />

to you with good fortune, since having been chosen emperor by the<br />

most noble soldiers, it is among you that I shall auspiciously take up

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!