The Roman Army, 31 BC–AD 337: A Sourcebook
The Roman Army, 31 BC–AD 337: A Sourcebook
The Roman Army, 31 BC–AD 337: A Sourcebook
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
186 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Roman</strong> <strong>Army</strong><br />
the undivided support of the praetorians could hardly inspire confidence in his<br />
capacity to rule. It became more difficult to arrange things so that this was<br />
done discreetly, since the accessions of Claudius and Nero highlighted the<br />
practical, overwhelming power of the army. But the support of the senate,<br />
expressed in its decree, was not negligible, and later Nero could speak of the<br />
‘authority of the senators’ and the ‘agreement of the soldiers’ (Annals, 13. 4).<br />
308 Tacitus, Histories 1. 4<br />
<strong>The</strong> death of Nero had been greeted at first with a wave of delight, but<br />
it had also stirred up different emotions not only in Rome among the<br />
senators, the people, and the soldiers in the capital, but also among all<br />
the legions and their commanders, since a secret of empire had been<br />
revealed—an emperor could be created outside Rome.<br />
<strong>The</strong> civil wars of AD 68–69 brought an abrupt end to the long-established<br />
Julio-Claudian dynasty. For nearly one hundred years the succession had been<br />
regulated inside the imperial family with the help of the praetorian guard. <strong>The</strong><br />
success of the governor of Spain, Sulpicius Galba, in seizing power in 68, brought<br />
the legionaries in the provinces dramatically to the forefront, demonstrated the<br />
helplessness of the senate and the inadequacy of the praetorians as a defence<br />
against an invasion of Italy by a provincial army, and substantially reduced the<br />
influence of the guard until the reign of Commodus. <strong>The</strong> example set by Galba<br />
was immediately followed by Vitellius, and then by Vespasian, who was to<br />
place the day of his assumption of power on 1 July AD 69, the day on which he<br />
had been acclaimed by the troops in Egypt, rather than on the day in late<br />
December AD 69, when his powers were formally voted by the senate (for the<br />
civil wars and the role of the army, see Campbell 1984:365–74).<br />
309 Dio, 64. 9<br />
People hated him (Otho) especially because he had revealed that the<br />
position of emperor could be bought, and had put Rome in thrall to<br />
the most audacious men; moreover, he placed no value on the senate<br />
and people and had indeed persuaded the soldiers that they could both<br />
kill and create an emperor.<br />
<strong>31</strong>0 SB 10295, with Bowman 1970, papyrus, Oxyrhynchus,<br />
AD 175 (?)<br />
Alexandrians [ _ _ _ ] you carry goodwill towards me [ _ _ _ ] in your<br />
hearts and remain steadfast in your opinions. I am [therefore] coming<br />
to you with good fortune, since having been chosen emperor by the<br />
most noble soldiers, it is among you that I shall auspiciously take up