12.06.2013 Views

The Roman Army, 31 BC–AD 337: A Sourcebook

The Roman Army, 31 BC–AD 337: A Sourcebook

The Roman Army, 31 BC–AD 337: A Sourcebook

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

244 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Roman</strong> <strong>Army</strong><br />

in respect of one person on the precedent of the field army soldiers.<br />

{Even if he should be discharged before completion of twenty years of<br />

service, he shall have the same munificence since weak and disabled<br />

people are not entered on the tax lists.}<br />

Cavalry soldiers and soldiers belonging to infantry cohorts are to be<br />

exempt in respect of their own person, as long as they remain on active<br />

service; and their veterans are to have the reward of similar exemption,<br />

if they should obtain their discharge at any time and in any area. Soldiers<br />

discharged from the field army because of old age or disablement are<br />

to be exempt in respect of two people, that is, each man and his wife,<br />

irrespective of the number of years served. And the territorial troops<br />

are to have the same privilege without distinction, if they prove that<br />

they were discharged as a result of wounds acquired in war, with the<br />

limitation that, if any of them should leave military service after serving<br />

fifteen years, before the completion of their twenty-four years, he is to<br />

enjoy exemption only in respect of his own person. But it is right to<br />

exempt the wife of one of the territorial troops, if he was discharged<br />

after twenty-four years’ service.<br />

Posted on 17 June at Antioch in the consulship of Paulinus and<br />

Julianus.<br />

This law contains a number of obscurities and contradictions, and Mommsen<br />

judged the passages marked { } to be interpolations. Moreover, the first paragraph<br />

is obscure and seems to contradict the rest of the law. It may have been<br />

mistakenly included in garbled form from an earlier law of Constantine on<br />

veterans’ privileges. On this basis we may distinguish: (1) the field army<br />

(comitatenses) who earn exemption of two tax units (for the soldier and his<br />

wife) after 24 years’ service and one tax unit after 20 years’ service; (2) territorial<br />

troops (ripenses—riverbank troops I take to be the equivalent of limitanei),<br />

who have the same exemptions; (3) soldiers of the alae and cohorts who made<br />

up the old auxiliary troops and who also constituted part of the territorial<br />

troops, who now receive exemption of one tax unit after 24 years’ service. In<br />

the event of a medical discharge, group (1) received exemption of two tax units<br />

in any circumstances, group (2) exemption of two units if they could prove<br />

that they had been wounded and had more than 15 years’ service; otherwise<br />

only one unit; group (3) got no benefits.<br />

Despite the difficulties, this law shows first a reduction in military privileges<br />

in relation to the letter of AD <strong>31</strong>1 (text no. 393); now that he was in full<br />

control Constantine was more confident in dealing with the troops, and tax<br />

exemptions were costly; and second, a formal distinction between the field<br />

army and the territorial troops. Now, although the field army troops are more<br />

privileged in respect of medical discharges, in the main the two groups were<br />

treated in a broadly similar fashion. Indeed Constantine improved the standing<br />

of the territorial troops by allowing them exemption for themselves after twenty

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!