The Roman Army, 31 BC–AD 337: A Sourcebook
The Roman Army, 31 BC–AD 337: A Sourcebook
The Roman Army, 31 BC–AD 337: A Sourcebook
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
176 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Roman</strong> <strong>Army</strong><br />
<strong>The</strong> reference to the soldier’s vine-wood staff suggests that Apuleius had a<br />
centurion in mind (though see Millar 1981:67, n. 25). In this scene set in <strong>The</strong>ssaly,<br />
Apuleius imagines how ordinary people went in fear of approaching soldiers,<br />
who were likely to be brutal and arrogant, inadequately supervised, using the<br />
name of the provincial governor or emperor to cover their wrongdoing, and<br />
difficult to bring to a fair trial; in Apuleius’ novel it is a joke on the theme of a<br />
reversal of fortune that the soldier gets beaten up, but for the gardener, with no<br />
hope of legal redress, this was probably the only way out. In the end the soldier<br />
profits from what was an act of open robbery. <strong>The</strong> dividing line between what<br />
soldiers could legally demand for transport and accommodation (note that the<br />
soldier is able to stay in the house of a town-councillor), and the unjust exploitation<br />
of this, was probably often blurred. Cf. New Testament, Matthew 5. 41 for<br />
compulsion on people to provide services (angareuein); see also text no. 298.<br />
292 D 1. 18. 6. 5–7<br />
(Ulpian (3rd C.AD), Book I Opinions)<br />
<strong>The</strong> governor of the province must ensure that persons of humble means<br />
are not subjected to injustice by having their solitary light or meagre<br />
furniture taken away for the use of others, under the pretext of the<br />
arrival of officials or soldiers. <strong>The</strong> governor of the province should<br />
ensure that nothing is done in the name of the soldiers by certain<br />
individuals unjustly claiming advantage for themselves, which does not<br />
relate to the communal benefit of the army as a whole.<br />
It is important that this formal judgment of a governor’s responsibilities by an<br />
experienced <strong>Roman</strong> offical assumes not only that <strong>Roman</strong> administration might<br />
be inequitable but also that soldiers were frequently to blame.<br />
293 P.S.I. 446=SP 221, papyrus, Egypt, AD 133–7<br />
Marcus Petronius Mamertinus, prefect of Egypt, declares: I have been<br />
informed that many of the soldiers, while travelling through the country,<br />
without a certificate requisition boats, animals, and persons beyond<br />
what is proper, on some occasions appropriating them by force, on<br />
others getting them from the strategoi by exercise of favour or deference.<br />
Because of this private persons are subjected to arrogance and abuse<br />
and the army has come to be censored for greed and injustice. I therefore<br />
order the strategoi and royal secretaries to furnish to absolutely no one<br />
any travel facilities at all without a certificate, whether he is travelling<br />
by river or by land, on the understanding that I shall punish severely