12.06.2013 Views

The Roman Army, 31 BC–AD 337: A Sourcebook

The Roman Army, 31 BC–AD 337: A Sourcebook

The Roman Army, 31 BC–AD 337: A Sourcebook

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2 <strong>The</strong> officers<br />

CENTURIONS<br />

Centurions were an important part of the command structure of the<br />

<strong>Roman</strong> army and held a more responsible position than that of noncommissioned<br />

officers in modern armies. <strong>The</strong>re were 59 centurions in<br />

a legion, with six centuries of 80 men in each of the ten cohorts, except<br />

the first, which consisted of five centuries of double strength. <strong>The</strong>re<br />

were several avenues of promotion to the centurionate: (1) men of<br />

equestrian status were sometimes admitted directly from civilian life.<br />

Doubtless some sought to escape from troubles at home by enlistment,<br />

and the substantial pay rates for centurions might help allay financial<br />

anxieties (about 18,000 sesterces in the second century AD, 72,000 for<br />

a chief centurion). <strong>The</strong> fact that equestrians were prepared to enlist<br />

demonstrates the status of the centurionate, but also shows that not all<br />

centurions were professional, well-trained soldiers. Men of equestrian<br />

rank, because of their social standing and superior education could<br />

expect rapid promotion; (2) legionaries with long service; serving<br />

legionaries will have made up the largest proportion of new centurions<br />

in any one year; they were generally men who had held a number of<br />

special posts and responsibilities (see pp. 28–32); (3) centurions and<br />

decurions of auxiliary units; (4) urban soldiers, especially praetorians,<br />

who had completed their term of military service in Rome.<br />

Rules of seniority within the centurionate are obscure, and the<br />

reconstruction of elaborate schemes of promotion is not justified on<br />

the basis of the evidence of career inscriptions, which cannot tell us<br />

why and how a man was promoted. <strong>The</strong> six centurions in each cohort<br />

were pilus prior, pilus posterior, princeps prior, princeps posterior,<br />

hastatus prior, hastatus posterior, and it is possible that centurions in<br />

all cohorts except the first were equal in rank, distinguished only by<br />

seniority. Promotion was then to the first cohort, whose five centurions<br />

were the most senior and were known as the primi ordines; the centurion

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!