22.10.2013 Views

An Unexplored Realm in the Heartland of the Southern Gulf ... - Famsi

An Unexplored Realm in the Heartland of the Southern Gulf ... - Famsi

An Unexplored Realm in the Heartland of the Southern Gulf ... - Famsi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>of</strong> basalt, but <strong>in</strong>stead, a body <strong>of</strong> stone placed <strong>in</strong> a fashion similar to <strong>the</strong> “Massive<br />

Offer<strong>in</strong>gs” <strong>of</strong> serpent<strong>in</strong>e at La Venta (Drucker et al. 1959:127-133).<br />

The coherence, or cont<strong>in</strong>uousness, <strong>of</strong> this anomaly is remarkable. To produce <strong>the</strong><br />

anomaly associated with Structure 84 would require that <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual stone blocks <strong>in</strong><br />

this structure were deposited toge<strong>the</strong>r and <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same orientation. In o<strong>the</strong>r words, each<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividual block <strong>of</strong> stone would have been placed <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> ground at El Marquesillo<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a similar orientation with respect to <strong>the</strong> magnetic field and <strong>in</strong> respect to <strong>the</strong><br />

o<strong>the</strong>r blocks <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> structure. The constructors <strong>of</strong> this feature had literally replicated <strong>the</strong><br />

same pattern and orientation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> stone as it was <strong>in</strong> its orig<strong>in</strong>al source matrix. Evidence<br />

from <strong>the</strong> <strong>Gulf</strong> Coast and o<strong>the</strong>r Formative period sites demonstrates that <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>habitants<br />

were acqua<strong>in</strong>ted with <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciples <strong>of</strong> magnetism and <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> magnetic poles<br />

with<strong>in</strong> basalt (Bre<strong>in</strong>er and Coe 1972; Carlson 1975; Fuson 1969; Guimarães 2004).<br />

There are o<strong>the</strong>r anomalies that are associated with architectural features. Positive<br />

and negative anomalies with peak-to-peak amplitudes <strong>of</strong> 90 nT are associated with<br />

Structure 83 and ano<strong>the</strong>r with Structure 86. These anomalies appear to be produced by<br />

basalt blocks located beneath <strong>the</strong> structures. In addition, <strong>the</strong>re are two types <strong>of</strong> random,<br />

isolated anomalies found throughout <strong>the</strong> site. The primary difference between <strong>the</strong>se latter<br />

types is <strong>the</strong>ir size and magnetic susceptibility. The smaller anomalies have a peak-to-peak<br />

amplitude <strong>of</strong> approximately 100 nT, while <strong>the</strong> larger ones have an amplitude <strong>of</strong> 150 nT.<br />

The smaller anomalies may <strong>in</strong>dicate hearths and <strong>the</strong> larger ones ceramic kilns that may be<br />

spatially related to <strong>the</strong> concentrations <strong>of</strong> ceramics recovered <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> surface collection and<br />

observations <strong>of</strong> quantities <strong>of</strong> potsherds along <strong>the</strong> exposed river cut bank. Overall, <strong>the</strong><br />

results confirm that all <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual anomalies at El Marquesillo present a high level <strong>of</strong><br />

153

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!