22.10.2013 Views

An Unexplored Realm in the Heartland of the Southern Gulf ... - Famsi

An Unexplored Realm in the Heartland of the Southern Gulf ... - Famsi

An Unexplored Realm in the Heartland of the Southern Gulf ... - Famsi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

period (1500-1150 BC) and, <strong>the</strong>refore, <strong>the</strong>se developments are relatively unknown<br />

(Sanders and Price 1968). Never<strong>the</strong>less, <strong>the</strong>re are political and geographic analogies<br />

among El Rabón, Cuatotolapan Viejo, San Lorenzo, and El Marquesillo. Each became<br />

strategic centers <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir own right, and all were tied directly to river courses and areas <strong>of</strong><br />

annual <strong>in</strong>undation (Cyphers 2004:273; Killion and Urcid 2001). In summary, <strong>the</strong>se four<br />

centers all began dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> same temporal phase and are <strong>the</strong> only sites known to conta<strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> earliest ceramic horizon <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> region. Their ceramic <strong>in</strong>ventories were restricted but<br />

highly uniform. Each site evolved as centers <strong>of</strong> socioeconomic development, and all were<br />

situated at similar geophysical locations. Cumulatively, this evidence suggests that <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>itial deposition <strong>of</strong> pre-Olmec ceramics could be seen as a marker for <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>itiation <strong>of</strong><br />

archaeologically detectable sedentism and eventual sociopolitical development.<br />

Cont<strong>in</strong>ued Occupation and Expansion at El Marquesillo<br />

Based on analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ceramic evidence from a site-wide surface collection,<br />

repeated surveys <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1.5 km-long exposed river cut, and excavations conducted dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong> Olmec throne rescue project, <strong>the</strong> pre-Olmec phase occupational area appears to be<br />

spatially restricted to <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn portion <strong>of</strong> Field 6. In contrast, <strong>the</strong> appearance <strong>of</strong><br />

ceramics associated with <strong>the</strong> San Lorenzo Olmec phase (c. 1150-900 BC) marks a po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

<strong>of</strong> significant change <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> scale <strong>of</strong> El Marquesillo’s 350 year-long settlement history.<br />

The distribution <strong>of</strong> ceramics from this later period <strong>in</strong>dicates an expansion <strong>of</strong> occupation<br />

to sectors across <strong>the</strong> entire survey area <strong>of</strong> Fields 1-8.<br />

Interpretation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> location <strong>of</strong> numerous surface and sub-surface features, along<br />

with differential artifact and ceramic deposition patterns suggests that <strong>the</strong> site conta<strong>in</strong>ed a<br />

252

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!