02.11.2013 Views

Sobibor - Holocaust Propaganda And Reality - Unity of Nobility ...

Sobibor - Holocaust Propaganda And Reality - Unity of Nobility ...

Sobibor - Holocaust Propaganda And Reality - Unity of Nobility ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

J. GRAF, T. KUES, C. MATTOGNO, SOBIBÓR 143<br />

1,900 kcal/kg. 421 At 60% humidity, red pine has a heating value <strong>of</strong><br />

about 2,000 kcal/kg – without taking into account the heat required to<br />

evaporate this water during combustion (640 kcal/kg <strong>of</strong> water). At a water<br />

content <strong>of</strong> 25% the heating value is 3,780 kcal/kg 422<br />

It follows that 1 kg <strong>of</strong> dry wood (20% humidity) with a calorific value<br />

<strong>of</strong> 3,800 kcal/kg is the equivalent <strong>of</strong> 1.9 kg <strong>of</strong> green wood.<br />

Thus, for the cremation <strong>of</strong> a corpse at Sobibór, some (210×1.9=)<br />

400 kg <strong>of</strong> fresh wood were needed. Thomas Blatt, however, asserts that<br />

“the pyre, sometimes more than three yards high, was then doused with<br />

kerosene [423] and ignited.” 424 Kurt Ticho/Thomas speaks also <strong>of</strong> coal as<br />

fuel for the cremations. 425 To demonstrate a fortiori the inconsistency <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>Holocaust</strong> thesis, we will assume that the use <strong>of</strong> kerosene and/or<br />

coal would have brought down the fresh wood requirements by one<br />

quarter, i.e. to 300 kg per corpse, even though such a hypothesis would<br />

be rather unlikely. 426<br />

What is more, the Third Reich could not afford to waste gasoline or<br />

other liquid fuels in such a manner. Schelvis tells us: 427<br />

“The pressing shortage <strong>of</strong> petrol and fuel oil had turned peat into<br />

a significant energy resource, as it was suitable not only for burning<br />

in stoves, but also as a fuel for generators. Globocnik complained<br />

about his dwindling petrol rations and <strong>of</strong> barely being able to keep<br />

his gassing engines running.”<br />

421<br />

422<br />

423<br />

424<br />

425<br />

426<br />

427<br />

See note 409: 3,400 Btu/lb = circa 1,900 Kcal/kg.<br />

“Energie rinnovabili” (renewable energies),<br />

www.pd.camcom.it/dev_cciaa/Web nsf/C1256C75005AA1D4C125735200246A54/$file<br />

/biomasse.pdf; according to other sources, the heating value is 3,700-3,800 kcal/kg for a<br />

humidity <strong>of</strong> 12-15%: www.c<strong>of</strong>ea.it/public/all_00029.pdf<br />

In a later German version (2004) quoted by Jens H<strong>of</strong>fman, the term “Benzin” (gasoline)<br />

appears here, presumably with the consent <strong>of</strong> Thomas Blatt. See J. H<strong>of</strong>fmann, “Das kann<br />

man nicht erzählen.” “Aktion 1005.” Wie die Nazis die Spuren ihrer Massenmorde in<br />

Osteuropa beseitigten, KVV konkret, Hamburg 2008, p. 244. The fuel value <strong>of</strong> gasoline<br />

is 10,500 Kcal/kg, almost identical to that <strong>of</strong> kerosene. It must be noted, however, that<br />

the use <strong>of</strong> gasoline would have been very dangerous on account <strong>of</strong> its volatility: by the<br />

time the corpses would have been thoroughly doused, ignition could have caused an explosion<br />

<strong>of</strong> the gasoline/air mixture.<br />

T. Blatt, op. cit. (note 17), p. 18.<br />

M. Novitch, op. cit. (note 39), p. 78.<br />

For example, in order to replace the heat produced by 100 kg <strong>of</strong> fresh wood,<br />

([2,000×100]÷10,300=] 19,4 liters <strong>of</strong> kerosene (or 19 liters <strong>of</strong> gasoline), or else<br />

([2,000×100]÷6,200=] 32.2 kg <strong>of</strong> coal per corpse would have been required, for a total <strong>of</strong><br />

(169,000×19.4=) 3,278,600 liters <strong>of</strong> kerosene (or 3,211,000 liters <strong>of</strong> gasoline) or<br />

(169,000×32.2=) 5,441,800 kg <strong>of</strong> coal, or amounts intermediate between the two, if both<br />

were used.<br />

J. Schelvis, op. cit. (note 70), p. 139.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!