02.11.2013 Views

Sobibor - Holocaust Propaganda And Reality - Unity of Nobility ...

Sobibor - Holocaust Propaganda And Reality - Unity of Nobility ...

Sobibor - Holocaust Propaganda And Reality - Unity of Nobility ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

148 J. GRAF, T. KUES, C. MATTOGNO, SOBIBÓR<br />

we have spoken <strong>of</strong> above and which required amounts <strong>of</strong> fuel and burning<br />

times far in excess <strong>of</strong> the fresh carcasses.<br />

This signifies that the cremation <strong>of</strong> the 80,000 corpses reportedly<br />

unearthed would have taken much longer and would have required<br />

much more wood than the cremation <strong>of</strong> the 89,000 fresh corpses.<br />

Furthermore climatic and weather conditions slowing down the cremation<br />

process must be taken into account as well, in particular days <strong>of</strong><br />

rain, snow, and frost during the winter months.<br />

5.3.9. The Ashes<br />

The human body contains about 5% ash, 405 similar to the ash content<br />

<strong>of</strong> cattle (6%). We will assume a value <strong>of</strong> 6% by volume for the wood,<br />

because it is fresh wood, very rich in water. Hence, the 169,000 corpses<br />

will yield (169,000×60×0.05=) 507,000 kg or 507 tons <strong>of</strong> ash, with the<br />

wood contributing (169,000×300×0.06 =) 3,042,000 kg or 3,042 tons,<br />

resulting in a total <strong>of</strong> 3,549 tons <strong>of</strong> ash.<br />

We come to the same result if we assume that one ton <strong>of</strong> corpses<br />

plus the necessary wood yield 350 kg <strong>of</strong> ash.<br />

Concerning the ash found in the camp, A. Kola asserts: 304<br />

“Particularly noticeable traces <strong>of</strong> cremation occurred in the<br />

lower parts <strong>of</strong> the graves where distinct layers <strong>of</strong> scorched bones,<br />

with a thickness up to 40-60 cm, could be identified”<br />

But this in disagreement with his description <strong>of</strong> the contents <strong>of</strong> the<br />

individual pits which claims that “the lower parts” <strong>of</strong> pits number 3, 4,<br />

5, and 6 did not contain “clearly identifiable layers <strong>of</strong> burnt bones having<br />

a thickness <strong>of</strong> 40 to 60 cm” but “remains <strong>of</strong> uncremated corpses in a<br />

state <strong>of</strong> saponification” whereas “in the upper layers” there were “remains<br />

<strong>of</strong> cremated corpses.” Pits number 1 and 2 also contained “remains<br />

<strong>of</strong> cremated corpses.” Such statements are not specific enough to<br />

permit a quantitative evaluation <strong>of</strong> the ash present in the camp.<br />

Still, even if we were to accept that all pits contained a layer <strong>of</strong> some<br />

50 cm <strong>of</strong> wood and corpse ash from cremations, not mixed with limestone<br />

and sand (which Kola mentions in particular for pit number 3), the<br />

respective volume would be (3,210×0.5=) 1,605 m 3 , equal to<br />

(1,605×0.4=) 642 tons, corresponding to about 34,500 corpses. In this<br />

somewhat unrealistic hypothesis we would still be left with another<br />

2,900 tons <strong>of</strong> ash, enough for 580 truckloads or 100 railway freight<br />

cars. Where would such enormous quantities <strong>of</strong> ash have ended up?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!