02.11.2013 Views

Sobibor - Holocaust Propaganda And Reality - Unity of Nobility ...

Sobibor - Holocaust Propaganda And Reality - Unity of Nobility ...

Sobibor - Holocaust Propaganda And Reality - Unity of Nobility ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

184 J. GRAF, T. KUES, C. MATTOGNO, SOBIBÓR<br />

Whether an SS man had committed such “excesses” in an extermination<br />

camp was obviously something which the court could only ascertain<br />

on the basis <strong>of</strong> testimonies. As there were always plenty <strong>of</strong> witnesses<br />

on hand during these trials, all eager to ascribe the most horrifying<br />

deeds to any one <strong>of</strong> the defendants, the court could easily put pressure<br />

on the SS men in the dock. After all, it was entirely up to the<br />

judges to classify witness statements as “credible” or not.<br />

The unbreakable rule was that a defendant could deny specific<br />

charges leveled against himself, but not the extermination <strong>of</strong> the Jews<br />

per se. Such latter arguments were considered “obstinate denials” and<br />

led to a more severe punishment. It is obvious that the defendants had<br />

been instructed accordingly by their lawyers who, for reasons <strong>of</strong> expediency,<br />

preferred not to question the concept <strong>of</strong> “extermination camps”<br />

drawn up by the courts, restricting themselves to insisting on the personal<br />

innocence <strong>of</strong> their clients or, at least, claim that the men had acted<br />

under military orders.<br />

This was obviously true for the Sobibór trial at Hagen as well. Thus<br />

Albert Rückerl could state unopposed: 522<br />

“In the main hearings, the defendants argued strongly against<br />

any excessive individual murder charges. They did not, however, deny<br />

their having participated under orders in the activities accompanying<br />

the mass gassings <strong>of</strong> Jews at Sobibór.”<br />

The sentencing <strong>of</strong> SS-Unterscharführer Erich Fuchs must be interpreted<br />

against this background. Fuchs was on trial for aiding and abetting<br />

with others the murder <strong>of</strong> at least 79,000 persons, but had escaped<br />

with a black eye and four years imprisonment. In March <strong>of</strong> 1963, long<br />

before the Hagen trial, Fuchs had declared the following in an interrogation<br />

by the prosecution: 523<br />

“On Wirth’s orders, [524] I drove a truck to Lemberg and picked up<br />

a carburetor engine which I took to Sobibór. On my arrival at Sobibór,<br />

I could see, near the station, an area with a concrete structure<br />

and several solid houses. The local Sonderkommando was headed by<br />

Thomalla. Other SS men present were F., B., Stangl, F., Schwarz, B.<br />

as well as some more. We unloaded the engine. It was a heavy Russian<br />

gasoline engine (probably a tank or tractor engine) <strong>of</strong> at least<br />

200 HP (V-engine, 8 cylinders, water-cooled). We placed the Motor<br />

522<br />

523<br />

524<br />

A. Rückerl (ed.), op. cit. (note 36), p. 85.<br />

A. Rückerl (ed.), op. cit. (note 36), p. 166.<br />

Christian Wirth, Inspector for Beec, Sobibór and Treblinka.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!