02.11.2013 Views

Sobibor - Holocaust Propaganda And Reality - Unity of Nobility ...

Sobibor - Holocaust Propaganda And Reality - Unity of Nobility ...

Sobibor - Holocaust Propaganda And Reality - Unity of Nobility ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

280 J. GRAF, T. KUES, C. MATTOGNO, SOBIBÓR<br />

correspond to the elusive Führerbefehl, the only reasonable conclusion<br />

which mainstream historiography could draw from the transfer <strong>of</strong> a portion<br />

<strong>of</strong> the T4 staff to the Aktion Reinhardt camps would be the extension<br />

<strong>of</strong> the euthanasia program to the Jews who were to be moved to the<br />

East. 850<br />

In such a case, however, the deportees in the camps would not all<br />

have been assassinated (except for a handful selected for work), but only<br />

a small fraction <strong>of</strong> them. One could thus no longer speak <strong>of</strong> pure extermination<br />

camps. Beec, Sobibór, and Treblinka would thus have had<br />

a double function: a principal function as a transit camp for the resettlement<br />

to the East, and a secondary function as a euthanasia center for<br />

the mentally ill or the incurably sick.<br />

This conclusion would also explain the double chain <strong>of</strong> command<br />

applying to those camps:<br />

Führer chancellery Wirth: for euthanasia<br />

Himmler Globocnik: for the deportation.<br />

It would also be in agreement with the (low) quantitative material<br />

findings at Beec and Sobibór (mass graves and ash) which cannot be<br />

integrated in any way into the thesis <strong>of</strong> extermination.<br />

The <strong>of</strong>ficial thesis discussed above contains, moreover, a fundamental<br />

incongruity. The reasoning <strong>of</strong> the verdict for the Sobibór trial<br />

states: 851<br />

“This command had the task <strong>of</strong> helping the sick and the disabled<br />

as well as the children which were not accompanying the women on<br />

the normal path to extermination to climb into vehicles. German<br />

guards, in an effort to make them or keep them unsuspicious as to<br />

the killing plan, explained to these arrivals that they would be taken<br />

to the camp ‘sick-bay.’ They were taken to the stretch <strong>of</strong> woods east<br />

<strong>of</strong> camp III and were then shot and interred by members <strong>of</strong> the Ger-<br />

850<br />

851<br />

According to mainstream <strong>Holocaust</strong> historiography, the Poles were subjected to euthanasia<br />

from autumn <strong>of</strong> 1939 onwards, but on a very limited scale (a few thousand persons).<br />

Stanisaw Batavia, “Zagada chorych psychicznie,” in: Biuletyn Gównej Komisji Badania<br />

Zbrodni Niemieckich w Polsce, III, Pozna 1947, pp. 91-106; Willi Dressen, op. cit.<br />

(note 762), pp. 62-65. However, the case <strong>of</strong> the 25,000-30,000 Poles suffering from incurable<br />

tuberculosis in the Warthegau raises doubts on this point. On 1 st May 1942 (NO-<br />

246) Gauleiter Greiser proposed to Himmler to kill them, but on 18 November this problem<br />

was still being discussed (NO-249), and in the end these patients were not killed.<br />

(“The Medical Case,” op. cit. (note 828), pp. 759-794, “Project To Kill Tubercular Polish<br />

Nationals”), although it would have been easy to send them to Chemno.<br />

A. Rückerl (ed.), op. cit. (note 36), p. 168.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!