02.11.2013 Views

Sobibor - Holocaust Propaganda And Reality - Unity of Nobility ...

Sobibor - Holocaust Propaganda And Reality - Unity of Nobility ...

Sobibor - Holocaust Propaganda And Reality - Unity of Nobility ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

174 J. GRAF, T. KUES, C. MATTOGNO, SOBIBÓR<br />

which, as we have already mentioned, is based exclusively on Esther<br />

Raab’s statements. 498<br />

“One day before his departure [to America], Samuel suddenly<br />

burst into Esther’s apartment, his face flushed with excitement. ‘Esther,<br />

come quick! It’s him!’[ 499 …] Since Samuel was scheduled to<br />

leave Germany the next day, he followed the police to the station<br />

and gave them a brief statement about the crimes committed by SS<br />

Oberscharführer Erich Bauer in Sobibór.’[ 495 …] ‘Samuel’s testimony<br />

stretched into the late afternoon, and it was already early evening<br />

when he finally left the station. He ran home to finish packing his belongings,<br />

and the next day he left the country as planned. Now, Esther<br />

remained the only person to witness against the notorious Bademeister.”<br />

The wording <strong>of</strong> the sentence against Erich Bauer squarely contradicts<br />

this account. When Bauer’s lawyer asked to have the two witnesses<br />

“L.” and “R.” (Lerer and Raab) confront the two former SS men<br />

“G.” (Hubert Gomerski) and “K.” (Johann Klier), the court struck down<br />

the request, saying i.a.: 500<br />

“An adjournment <strong>of</strong> the proceedings would also disallow another<br />

objective <strong>of</strong> the defense, i.e. a confrontation <strong>of</strong> these witnesses with<br />

the witnesses L. and R., because the latter have announced that they<br />

are about to emigrate; thus a new main hearing would have to take<br />

place without them.”<br />

Hence, Samuel Lerer, at the time <strong>of</strong> the trial, had not yet emigrated<br />

at all and was still in Berlin, continuing to be a witness for the prosecution<br />

against Bauer. The arrest <strong>of</strong> the latter had incidentally taken place<br />

in 1949, 501 which means that several months had passed between Bauer’s<br />

identification by Lerer and the trial. It is inconceivable that Esther<br />

Raab could have forgotten these circumstances and Lerer’s participation<br />

in the trial, which means that she lied to Shaindy Perl on purpose. The<br />

only motive for this would be egocentricity: Esther Raab apparently<br />

wanted to be the only person to have tracked down Bauer all by herself<br />

and without any help from Lerer.<br />

498<br />

499<br />

500<br />

501<br />

S. Perl, op. cit. (note 62), p. 222.<br />

S. Perl, op. cit. (note 62), p. 219.<br />

LG Berlin, op. cit. (note 277), p. 7.<br />

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/<strong>Sobibor</strong>-Prozess. J. Schelvis confirms on p. 236 that Bauer’s<br />

arrest took place in 1949. On p. 247, though, he asserts that Bauer was arrested as early<br />

as 1946 (op. cit. (note 71)). We assume that the former date, and not the latter, is in accordance<br />

with the facts.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!