02.11.2013 Views

Sobibor - Holocaust Propaganda And Reality - Unity of Nobility ...

Sobibor - Holocaust Propaganda And Reality - Unity of Nobility ...

Sobibor - Holocaust Propaganda And Reality - Unity of Nobility ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

J. GRAF, T. KUES, C. MATTOGNO, SOBIBÓR 287<br />

In the preceding chapter we have noted that the Sobibór camp could<br />

not have lacked an delousing facility with baths, if only to protect the<br />

health <strong>of</strong> the German and Ukrainian personnel. Such a sanitary installation,<br />

however, is not found on any map drawn by former detainees or<br />

SS men. It was probably located in the hut labeled Object E by Kola, in<br />

which toilet articles were found. 871<br />

Jan Piwonski relates that an SS man addressed the crowd at the<br />

camp stating that “now you have arrived at Sobibór, this is a transit station;<br />

so now, you are going to pass through a series <strong>of</strong> high pressure sanitary<br />

systems, you will then be directed to areas where you will set<br />

yourselves up permanently and work,” 872 which reminds us <strong>of</strong> an installation<br />

for the production <strong>of</strong> steam used for disinfection and/or disinfestation.<br />

In any case, it is a known fact that real showers and disinfestation<br />

facilities were claimed by <strong>Holocaust</strong> propaganda immediately after the<br />

war to have been merely fictitious installations designed to fool the victims.<br />

It is hard to believe that Richard David Breitman would write as<br />

late as 1991: 873<br />

“At Majdanek, Globocnik’s realm, a large quantity <strong>of</strong> installations<br />

have been saved from destruction. The building which housed<br />

the gas chambers still exists – with its outside inscription Entrance<br />

to baths, and one can see the showers and pipes which were not put<br />

in to supply water but to fool the victims.”<br />

If a famous historian could have gone as far as that, what can we expect<br />

from ordinary deportees?<br />

A similar account <strong>of</strong> the function <strong>of</strong> Sobibór was given by Judith<br />

Eliazer in her testimony at Rotterdam on 5 February 1946, in which she<br />

said: 874 “On 10 March 1943 we went directly from Westerbork to Sobibór,<br />

where we arrived on 13 or 15 March. There we were selected.<br />

Thirty girls and 44 men were taken out. The remainder were gassed<br />

and burned. (We have seen that the others were moved away in tilting<br />

trolleys. They may have been dumped into pits.) Sobibór was not<br />

a camp. It was a transit camp.” (Emph. added)<br />

871<br />

872<br />

873<br />

874<br />

Cf. chapter 5.4.2.5., p. 157.<br />

Emph. added. J. Piwonski, op. cit. (note 221).<br />

R.D. Breitman, Himmler. Il burocrate dello sterminio, Mondadori, Milano 1991, p. 318.<br />

ROD [Rijksinstituut voor Oorlogsdocumentatie, Amsterdam], 200AR-Z251/59 0V, p.<br />

904.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!