02.11.2013 Views

Sobibor - Holocaust Propaganda And Reality - Unity of Nobility ...

Sobibor - Holocaust Propaganda And Reality - Unity of Nobility ...

Sobibor - Holocaust Propaganda And Reality - Unity of Nobility ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

J. GRAF, T. KUES, C. MATTOGNO, SOBIBÓR 391<br />

12. Conclusions<br />

12.1. The Moral Responsibility <strong>of</strong> the Camp Personnel<br />

Our conclusions are absolutely clear: Sobibór was not an extermination<br />

camp; it had no “gassing building” and hence no homicidal gas<br />

chambers. Some 10,000 people may have died there; such a figure<br />

would amount to one twenty-fifth <strong>of</strong> the figure <strong>of</strong> 250,000 victims<br />

widely quoted in the literature, or to one seventeenth <strong>of</strong> the figure <strong>of</strong><br />

170,000 given by J. Schelvis in the revised edition <strong>of</strong> his book, or to<br />

one fifteenth <strong>of</strong> the “minimum number” <strong>of</strong> 150,000 victims assumed by<br />

the Hagen court in 1966.<br />

If our thesis is correct – and we are convinced that it is – and if Sobibór<br />

was a transit camp for Jews being moved into areas further east,<br />

we must obviously reassess the moral responsibility <strong>of</strong> the camp personnel,<br />

from the commanding <strong>of</strong>ficer on down to the Ukrainian guards<br />

who constituted the lowest echelon <strong>of</strong> the chain <strong>of</strong> command. It goes<br />

without saying that even in such a case the personnel involved did execute<br />

orders that constituted a gross violation <strong>of</strong> human rights, for no-one<br />

can argue against the fact that the deportation and expropriation <strong>of</strong><br />

people on the sole basis <strong>of</strong> them being members <strong>of</strong> an ethnic or religious<br />

group and not for any individual wrongdoing is indeed a most serious<br />

transgression against human rights. On the other hand, these<br />

people were acting under orders, the execution <strong>of</strong> which they could not<br />

refuse without possibly endangering their own lives. It was not up to<br />

them to decide whether such orders were lawful or not, but the manner<br />

in which they executed them certainly was. Thus, the moral responsibility<br />

<strong>of</strong> the camp personnel hinges on the question as to whether or not<br />

they treated the detainees – during their short stay in the camp – as humanely<br />

as was possible under the prevailing circumstances, or whether<br />

they humiliated them; whether they made things bearable for the working<br />

Jews, or whether they did their part to create a little hell <strong>of</strong> their<br />

own for these people.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!