02.11.2013 Views

Sobibor - Holocaust Propaganda And Reality - Unity of Nobility ...

Sobibor - Holocaust Propaganda And Reality - Unity of Nobility ...

Sobibor - Holocaust Propaganda And Reality - Unity of Nobility ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

264 J. GRAF, T. KUES, C. MATTOGNO, SOBIBÓR<br />

years earlier, which describes the same building as a “stone construction.”<br />

791<br />

The former SS-Unterscharführer Erich Fuchs, who supposedly installed<br />

the gassing engine, testified: 792<br />

“Upon my arrival at Sobibór I found near the station an area<br />

with a concrete structure and several permanent houses.”<br />

It is apparent from the context that the “concrete structure” is identical<br />

with the alleged gas chamber building. One notes that, while<br />

Stangl places the gas chamber building a considerable distance from the<br />

railway station and isolated “back in the woods,” 760 Fuchs claims the<br />

same installation to have been located in an area “near the station” together<br />

with other buildings. This contradiction, however, is small compared<br />

to that revealed by the testimony <strong>of</strong> alleged “Gasmeister” Erich<br />

Bauer: 793<br />

“The gas chamber was already there, a wooden building on a<br />

concrete base about the same size as this courtroom, though much<br />

lower, as low as a normal house. There were two or three chambers,<br />

in front <strong>of</strong> which there was a corridor that, from the outside, you accessed<br />

via a bridge.”<br />

Thus the witnesses disagree on the very construction material <strong>of</strong> the<br />

first gas chamber building!<br />

How do mainstream <strong>Holocaust</strong> historians handle this glaring contradiction?<br />

As seen above, Arad simply ignores the statement <strong>of</strong> the key<br />

witness Bauer, while combining the descriptions <strong>of</strong> Stangl and Fuchs<br />

into “a solid brick building with a concrete foundation.” Schelvis, on<br />

the other hand, finds it necessary to confront Bauer’s testimony. In the<br />

German edition <strong>of</strong> his Sobibór book, published in 1998, we read: 794<br />

“Bauer was mistaken about the wooden building. It was a solid<br />

brick house.”<br />

For some reason, however, Schelvis had completely changed his<br />

mind about this issue by the time the English language edition <strong>of</strong> the<br />

same book appeared in 2006. In this we read: 795<br />

791<br />

792<br />

793<br />

794<br />

795<br />

Statement made by Stangl in Duisburg on 29 April, 1969, ZStL-230/59-12-4464; quoted<br />

in J. Schelvis, op. cit. (note 71), p. 33.<br />

Statement made by Erich Fuchs in Düsseldorf on 2 April 1963, ZStL-251/59-9-1785;<br />

quoted in J. Schelvis, op. cit. (note 71), p. 100.<br />

Erich Bauer in Hagen on 6 October 1965; StA.Do-X’65-176, quoted in J. Schelvis, op.<br />

cit. (note 71), p. 101.<br />

J. Schelvis, op. cit. (note 70), p. 119 and p. 120, note 285.<br />

J. Schelvis, op. cit. (note 71), p. 114, note 17.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!