02.11.2013 Views

Sobibor - Holocaust Propaganda And Reality - Unity of Nobility ...

Sobibor - Holocaust Propaganda And Reality - Unity of Nobility ...

Sobibor - Holocaust Propaganda And Reality - Unity of Nobility ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

376 J. GRAF, T. KUES, C. MATTOGNO, SOBIBÓR<br />

ly banished to Elba. After he had succeeded in leaving the island and in<br />

collecting once again a large army which then lost the decisive battle <strong>of</strong><br />

Waterloo, he was, once again, not condemned and hanged but merely<br />

banished once more – this time, though, to the remote island <strong>of</strong> St. Helena<br />

which made any return impossible. In doing so, the victors made<br />

sure that Napoleon could never again constitute a danger – his honor<br />

remained untouched. At that time the Occident valued highly such<br />

things as chivalry and the respect for a courageous enemy.<br />

All the more so, no one would have dreamed <strong>of</strong> pursuing a subject <strong>of</strong><br />

the French emperor for “war crimes” and certainly not decades after the<br />

act – be it real or imagined. The thought that a French <strong>of</strong>ficer, ninety<br />

years <strong>of</strong> age, could have had to appear before a court in 1874 for having<br />

shot Spanish guerrilleros in 1809, when he was twenty-five years old,<br />

would certainly have been viewed as something completely absurd to a<br />

European citizen <strong>of</strong> the 19 th century.<br />

With the triumph <strong>of</strong> “democracy” and “human rights” in 1945, however,<br />

all this changed completely. The sinister farce mounted at Nuremberg,<br />

in which the victors who themselves had committed heinous<br />

crimes against humanity, hypocritically took on the role <strong>of</strong> judges over<br />

the vanquished, sending the latter to the gallows or behind prison walls<br />

on the basis <strong>of</strong> laws decreed ex post facto, amounted to the refusal <strong>of</strong><br />

any idea <strong>of</strong> chivalry. We may believe, though, that at the time, in the<br />

immediate post war years, few people would have supposed that such<br />

trials <strong>of</strong> men who had unfortunately been on the losing side would still<br />

be held over five dozen years later.<br />

John Demjanjuk’s martyrium is unfortunately not an exception. For<br />

11 years now Erich Priebke, born in 1913, has been under house arrest<br />

in Italy, because 65 years ago he had to shoot two hostages close to<br />

Rome. In March 1944, after a terrorist attack by communist guerillas<br />

had claimed the lives <strong>of</strong> 33 German policemen (plus several Italian civilians),<br />

Adolf Hitler personally ordered to shoot ten hostages for every<br />

policeman killed. The reprisal was carried out the day after the attack.<br />

The victims were for the most part men who were already in prison for<br />

underground activities. Women or children were not among them.<br />

Sixty men had to take part in the reprisal shootings, among them<br />

seven <strong>of</strong>ficers. One <strong>of</strong> them was Erich Priebke. If he had refused to<br />

obey, he himself would have been shot: 1108<br />

1108 Erich Priebke, Paolo Giachini, Vae victis. Autobiografia, Associazione Uomo e Liberta,<br />

Rome 2003, p. 125.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!